iRubric: L539 Materials Evaluation Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
L539 Materials Evaluation Paper L539 Language Learning Philosophy Paper Choose one of the instructional materials provided (in Assignments folder). As an alternative, you may suggest materials that you are currently use [scan the pages to be evaluated and send them to Dr. Samuelson to be approved]. Critically evaluate the materials on the basis of their coherent use of language principles we have covered in this course. You can ask the following questions: • What are the aims of the materials? How might they be used to develop students’ language abilities? • What linguistic features do the materials address (e.g. phonemic awareness, phonics, syntax, and/or morphology)? • What underlying assumptions or views of language or language learning are identifiable in the materials? Draw upon the class readings for evidence or non-evidence of these assumptions. • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the materials and how could they be improved? L539, Language Foundations for ESL/EFL Teachers Rubric Code: V5W6B Ready to use Public Rubric Locked Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Graduate

Language Learning Philosophy Paper Descriptions 50 %
	Weak 10 pts	Low Average 20 pts	High Average 30 pts	Strong 40 pts	Exceptional 50 pts
Content 50 pts Your responses clearly relate to the questions and include several well-described supporting details and/or examples. (50%)	Weak	Low Average	High Average	Strong	Exceptional
Enter Title 40 %
	Weak 4 pts	Low Average 8 pts	High Average 12 pts	Strong 16 pts	Exceptional 20 pts
Organization 20 pts Your paper demonstrates suitable development of ideas and all parts are united in a cohesive whole. (20%)	Weak	Low Average	High Average	Strong	Exceptional
Readability 20 pts Your prose is readable and is written in an academic style (not chatty or informal). (20%)	Weak	Low Average	High Average	Strong	Exceptional
Enter Title 10 %
	Weak 1 pts	Low Average 2 pts	High Average 3 pts	Strong 4 pts	Exceptional 5 pts
Correctness 5 pts Your paper has no (or few) grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. (5%)	Weak	Low Average	High Average	Strong	Exceptional
Stylesheet 5 pts Your paper follows the guidelines described in the syllabus and assignment (min. pages, formatting, file name). Your assignment was submitted on time using Oncourse. (5%)	Weak	Low Average	High Average	Strong	Exceptional