Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Student Teaching Culminating Activity rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Student Teaching Culminating Activity 
Rubric Code: L4888
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Locked Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Culminating Activity
  Minimal

1 pts

Emergent

2 pts

Proficient

3 pts

Knowledge – appropriateness

Minimal

Content is inappropriate for most students. Resources used were not relevant or integrated into lesson.
Emergent

Content presented is appropriate for most students. Resources used were generally relevant and integrated into the lesson.
Proficient

The level of content presented is appropriate for all the students. Resources were relevant to objectives and integrated effectively in the lesson.
Knowledge – assessments

Minimal

Assessments do not match objectives, and little or no feedback is provided to, or collected from students.
Emergent

Assessments are varied and matched to objectives, and adequate feedback is provided to, and collected from students.
Proficient

Multiple assessments match objectives and feedback provided to, and collected from students is timely and constructive.
Knowledge - alignment

Minimal

Lessons are incomplete, with no connection to state standards or the existing curricular framework.
Emergent

Lesson is sufficient, with some connection to state standards and the existing curricular framework
Proficient

Lesson is well organized and comprehensive, with a clear connection to state standards and the existing curricular framework
Knowledge – effectiveness

Minimal

Minimal description of the effectiveness of planning, implementation, and evaluation of student learning
Emergent

Understanding of the effectiveness of planning, implementation, and evaluation of student learning
Proficient

Integrated analysis of the effectiveness of planning, implementation, and evaluation of student learning
Environment – resources

Minimal

Lessons reflect a lack of preparation and organization of resources and materials.
Emergent

Lessons reflect adequate preparation and organization of resources and materials.
Proficient

Lessons reflect comprehensive preparation and organization of resources and materials.
Environment – engagement

Minimal

Analysis includes a minimal description of student engagement and impact on instruction
Emergent

Analysis includes an understanding of student engagement and impact on instruction
Proficient

Analysis includes an insightful analysis of student engagement and impact on instruction.
Environment – transitions

Minimal

Minimal description of the effective use of instructional time including transitions between activities.
Emergent

Good understanding of the effective use of instructional time including transitions between activities.
Proficient

Insightful analysis of the effective use of instructional time including the quality of transitions between activities.
Environment - effectiveness

Minimal

Minimal description of the impact of the learning environment on student learning including factors such as space, resources, time, and behavior
Emergent

Understanding of the impact of the learning environment on student learning including factors such as space, resources, time, and behavior
Proficient

Integrated analysis of the impact of the learning environment on student learning including factors such as space, resources, time, and behavior
Personalization – differentiation

Minimal

Little evidence of differentiation for individual student ability levels.
Emergent

Some evidence of general differentiation among individual student ability levels.
Proficient

Strong evidence of differentiation for individual student ability levels.
Personalization – strategies

Minimal

Lessons lack creativity, are not engaging; activities address primarily only one learning style.
Emergent

Lessons reflect basic level of creativity, are somewhat engaging; activities address more than one learning style.
Proficient

Lessons are creative; activities are engaging and reflective of student interest
Personalization – relationships

Minimal

Limited description of the rapport and respect reflected in a professional relationship with students.
Emergent

Some evidence of the rapport and respect reflected in a professional relationship with students.
Proficient

Insightful understanding of the rapport and mutual respect reflected in a professional relationship with students.
Personalization – effectiveness

Minimal

Minimal description of the impact of the differentiated instruction on the success or shortcomings of the unit; vague examples for improving differentiated instruction
Emergent

Understanding of the impact of the differentiated instruction on the successes and shortcomings of the unit; general examples for improving differentiated instruction
Proficient

Integrated analysis of the impact of the differentiated instruction on successes and shortcomings of the unit; insightful and relevant examples for improving differentiated instruction
Community – parents

Minimal

No evidence of parent communication regarding class activities or student performance.
Emergent

Communicates with parents to provide information about class activities and/or student performance.
Proficient

Creatively provides information about class activities, to encourage involvement, and to report students’ performance.
Community – resources

Minimal

Minimal evidence presented of resources used or connections made to the community
Emergent

Demonstrates an understanding of the resources available in the community, some integration into the unit.
Proficient

Utilizes available community resources in the unit, effectively engaging community members, information, or perspectives
Community – integration

Minimal

Demonstrates little effort to include the input or resources of colleagues in the unit.
Emergent

Shows some initiative in understanding and including the school community in the unit planning and implementation.
Proficient

Takes initiative to make connections and integrating the school community into the unit in meaningful ways.
Community - effectiveness

Minimal

Minimal description of the impact of the community on the success or shortcomings of the unit; vague examples of planned improvements
Emergent

Understanding of the impact of the community on the successes and shortcomings of the unit; general examples of planned improvements
Proficient

Integrated analysis of the impact of the community on successes and shortcomings of the unit; insightful and relevant examples of planned improvements
Reflection – modifications

Minimal

Changes do not seem relevant to the issues observed, no other possibilities considered, and/or no rationale given
Emergent

Changes seem relevant with adequate rationale and other possibilities considered
Proficient

Relevant changes based on a clear outline of several valid modifications and rationale, accurate insight into what the result of the changes will be
Reflections – criticism

Minimal

Limited evidence provided of efforts to improve as a teacher and member of the school community
Emergent

Some responsiveness and incorporation of collegial advice, suggestions, or perspectives from colleagues in the school community
Proficient

Internalizes and shares knowledge from professional experiences with colleagues in the school community, actively seeking ways to improve the experience
Reflections– outcomes

Minimal

Description of student outcomes has little differentiation among ability level and very basic connection to the work samples and assessments
Emergent

Understanding of student outcomes with general differentiation among ability level and adequate connection to work samples and assessments
Proficient

Insightful analysis of student outcomes with clear differentiation among ability levels based on concrete connections to work samples and assessments
Reflections – impact on learning

Minimal

Minimal description of the effectiveness in teaching the unit in terms of impact on student learning; vague examples of potential improvements with little understanding of the impact of the changes
Emergent

Understanding of the effectiveness in teaching the unit in terms of impact on student learning; general examples of potential improvements with some understanding of the impact of the changes
Proficient

Integrated analysis of the effectiveness in teaching the unit in terms of impact on student learning; insightful and relevant examples of potential improvements with realistic understanding of the impact of the changes
Disposition – changes/past

Minimal

Description of key dispositional changes is vague; evidence does not support changes or is not provided
Emergent

Description and examples are connected loosely and show a basic understanding of dispositional changes during student teaching
Proficient

Interconnected description and examples of dispositional changes show an insightful understanding of a mature professional
Disposition – fairness

Minimal

Analysis of fairness is limited or irrelevant; examples do not show an understanding of fairness
Emergent

Analysis and examples are connected loosely and show a basic understanding of fairness during the unit
Proficient

Interconnected analysis and examples of fairness show an insightful understanding of a mature professional
Disposition – belief

Minimal

Analysis of beliefs about student learning is limited or irrelevant; resolution does not show an understanding of the belief
Emergent

Analysis and examples are connected loosely and show a basic understanding of the belief that all students can learn
Proficient

Interconnected description and examples of the belief that all students can learn and shows an insightful understanding of a mature professional
Growth –professional

Minimal

No areas identified, no documentation, and/or areas are not relevant
Emergent

Areas for improvement are outlined generally with basic documentation included
Proficient

Specific areas for improvement are outlined with clear rationale and realistic documentation
Growth – personal

Minimal

No areas identified, no documentation, and/or areas are not relevant
Emergent

Areas of personal growth are outlined generally with basic documentation included
Proficient

Specific areas of personal growth are outlined with clear detail and relevance
Growth – through seminar activities

Minimal

Evidence of areas of growth through the seminar is very limited, ambiguous, or irrelevant
Emergent

General understanding of professional growth through participation in the seminar
Proficient

Insightful analysis of professional growth through participation in the seminar
Growth – effectiveness

Minimal

Minimal description of the impact of student teaching on the candidate’s potential as a member of the profession; vague examples of lessons for the first year of teaching
Emergent

Understanding of the impact of student teaching on the candidate’s potential as a member of the profession; general examples of lessons for the first year of teaching
Proficient

Integrated analysis of the impact of student teaching on the candidate’s potential as a member of the profession; insightful and relevant examples of lessons for the first year of teaching



Keywords:
  • M 420







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n202