Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Practice Teach Lesson Plans rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Practice Teach Lesson Plans 
Rubric Code: H5397
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Practice Teach
Enter rubric description
  Proficient

5 pts

Basic

3 pts

Unsatisfactory

2 pts

Missing Components

1 pts

Video Recording
100 %

Proficient

Video of lesson is submitted by given due date. Lesson is 20 to 30 minutes in length. Video is of a format that can be opened with Real Player, Window Media Player, or Quick Time Player.
Basic

Video of lesson is submitted by the given due date. Lesson is less than 20 minutes but more than 15 minutes. Video is of a format that can be opened with Real Player, Window Media Player, or Quick Time Player.
Unsatisfactory

Video of lesson is submitted within 24 hours after the given date. Lesson is less than 15 minutes or more than 30 minutes in length. Video is of a format that can be opened with Real Player, Window Media Player, or Quick Time Player.
Missing Components

Video of lesson is submitted more than 24 hours after the given due date. Lesson is less than 15 minutes in length. Video is not of the format that can be opened with Real Player, Window Media Player, or Quick Time Player.
Individual Review
100 %

Proficient

A one page summary of your analysis of the video is offered. In this summary you reflect on what you saw and on the comments of your PLC peer members. PLC member comments are turned in with the summary.
Basic

A one page summary of your analysis of the video is offered. In this summary you reflect on what you saw or on the comments of your PLC peer members, but not both. PLC member comments are turned in with the summary.
Unsatisfactory

A summary of your analysis of the video is offered, but is less than one page. In this summary you reflect on what you saw or on the comments of your PLC peer members, but not both. PLC member comments are turned in with the summary.
Missing Components

A summary of your analysis of the video is offered, but is less than one page. In this summary you do not reflect on what you saw nor on the comments of your PLC peer members. The summary rambles and does not address the video. PLC member comments are not turned in with the summary.
Communication
100 %

Proficient

Your summary is typed, using 12 point font (Calibri, Times New Roman, or Cambria). The summary is double spaced. Informal language is used but no slang, profanity, or poor punctuation is used.
Basic

Your summary is missing one of the following:
Summary is typed, using 12 point font (Calibri, Times New Roman, or Cambria). The summary is double spaced. Informal language is used but no slang, profanity, or poor punctuation is used.
Unsatisfactory

Your summary is missing two of the following:
Summary is typed, using 12 point font (Calibri, Times New Roman, or Cambria). The summary is double spaced. Informal language is used but no slang, profanity, or poor punctuation is used.
Missing Components

Your summary is not legible. The typing, font or spacing makes it hard to read. The language and/or punctuation used is inappropriate and/or hard to follow.
Mathematical Language
100 %

Proficient

Language used in the technology slides is mathematically and grammatically correct. You do not address your students as they are your peers. Mathematics language in the lesson delivery is appropriate.
Basic

Language used in the technology slides is mathematically or grammatically correct. You do not address your students as peers. Mathematical language in the lesson delivery is occasionally incorrect.
Unsatisfactory

Language used in the technology slides is mathematically and grammatically incorrect. You address your students as peers. Mathematical language in the lesson delivery has major errors.
Missing Components

Language used in the technology slides is grossly mathematically and grammatically incorrect. You address your students as peers. Mathematical language in the lesson delivery is often incorrect to the point where the efficacy of the lesson is severely affected.
Peer Review
140 %

Proficient

Peer Review comments are provided by every member of your PLC for their videos. One comment deals with a strength found in your peer’s lesson and one comment focuses on an area of improvement needed in your peer’s lesson.
Basic

Peer Review comments are provided by most members of your PLC for their videos. One comment deals with a strength found in your peer’s lesson and one comment focuses on an area of improvement needed in your peer’s lesson.
Unsatisfactory

Peer Review comments are provided by only one or two members of your PLC for their videos. One comment deals with a strength found in your peer’s lesson or one comment focuses on an area of improvement needed in your peer’s lesson, but not both.
Missing Components

Peer Review comments are not provided by the other members of your PLC for their videos. Comments do not focus on the lesson, they are disjointed or not applicable to the video.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178