Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Learner Characteristics/Goal Setting rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Learner Characteristics/Goal Setting 
The purpose of this assignment sequence is to give you experience with developing a case study of a second language writer. You should incorporate ideas and information from the readings in your work, providing citations where needed. This paper should be 2-3 pages long and follow the guidelines described in the syllabus.
Rubric Code: B5737
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Content
  Exemplary

Exemplary; consistent with professional expectations.

5 pts

Meets Expectations

Contains all required elements within a criterion.

4 pts

Approaching Expectations

Most criteria have been met but may need further development.

3 pts

Falls Short of Expectations

Wholly or largely failed to address a particular criterion.

2 pts

Describing Learner Characteristics
30 %

Exemplary

Description is informative and engaging; provides a "whole picture" of the learner.
Meets Expectations

Description is complete and informative. The reader can begin to "get a picture" of your learner from your description.
Approaching Expectations

Provides most essential elements. Some criterion are missing or need to be addressed more fully to help the reader understand your learner.
Falls Short of Expectations

Description is perfunctory or absent. More information is needed for the reader to understand the focus learner.
Planning for Instruction/Strategies
30 %

Exemplary

Proposed teaching ideas/strategies are creative, innovative and obviously selected with both the focus learner and appropriate literature in mind.
Meets Expectations

Proposed teaching ideas/strategies are appropriate to the focus learner and existing literature is referenced as necessary.
Approaching Expectations

Includes a limited number of teaching ideas and/or strategies. Consideration of focus learner's needs and existing literature is somewhat evident, but needs to be developed.
Falls Short of Expectations

Planning for instruction is perfunctory or absent. Few or no ideas/strategies are addressed or have little or no relation to the focus learner as described in the paper.
Rationale
20 %

Exemplary

At all phases, rationale is evident, directly related to the needs of your learner, and clearly supported by relevant literature.
Meets Expectations

A rationale is established; relevant literature is appropriate and supports your choices.
Approaching Expectations

Rationale is established but needs further development. Referenced literature is relevant, but may be lacking.
Falls Short of Expectations

Little or no rationale is provided. References to the literature are missing or do not support your conclusions.
Organization/Timeliness
Choosing a Participant
10 %

Exemplary

Evidence provided that all deadlines leading up to this assignment were met in a timely fashion.
Meets Expectations

All students who meet this criterion will receive a score of "exceeds expectations" as described in the rubric.
Approaching Expectations

Although all criterion may have been met, it was not in accordance with the deadlines as described in the syllabus and course schedule.
Falls Short of Expectations

One or more deadlines for choosing a participant were missed or criterion for choosing a focus learner have not been met.
Organization
4 %

Exemplary

Very well-organized and clearly developed. All parts are cohesive and clearly connected.
Meets Expectations

Paper demonstrates suitable organization and is cohesive.
Approaching Expectations

Somewhat organized, but needs further development to create a cohesive assignment that connects all parts of the paper.
Falls Short of Expectations

Paper lacks organization or the parts are presented in isolation with little or no attempt to provide a cohesive whole.
Formatting/Following Guidelines
3 %

Exemplary

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments as provided in syllabus. APA formatting is accurate and and consistently applied throughout.
Meets Expectations

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments as provided in syllabus. APA formatting is mostly correct (1-2 small errors) and consistently applied throughout.
Approaching Expectations

An evident attempt was made to follow APA style guidelines but the paper contains several errors or guidelines are inconsistently applied.
Falls Short of Expectations

APA style guidelines have not been followed or are inconsistently applied. Guidelines for assignments are inconsistently or inaccurately applied.
Editing/Mechanics
3 %

Exemplary

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; final product is polished and professional. Few to no errors.
Meets Expectations

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; may contain a few errors but these do not detract much from the overall level of professionalism.
Approaching Expectations

Editing is mostly consistent but may be unevenly applied, or contains several errors which detract from the overall professionalism of the paper.
Falls Short of Expectations

Editing is inconsistent or unevenly applied throughout the entire paper. Grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors are so numerous as to seriously detract from the professionalism of the paper.



Keywords:
  • Grad, ESL, ELL, ENL, Writing, Case Study, L541

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178