Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: H464 YRBS Advocacy Paper Rubric

iRubric: H464 YRBS Advocacy Paper Rubric


(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
H464 YRBS Advocacy Paper Rubric 
YRBS Advocacy Paper Rubric
Rubric Code: B4C37
Draft
Private Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric YRBS Advocacy Paper
Enter rubric description
  No Way

(N/A)

Part Way

(N/A)

On the Way

(N/A)

All the Way

(N/A)

Introduction

2 points
No Way

The paper DOES NOT provide a detailed description about YRBS and does NOT mention survey credibility and reliability, OR a description of the agency, survey, and methodology, OR utilize proper citations.
Part Way

The paper lacks important detail regarding the YRBS and does not completely answer questions regarding survey credibility and reliability or a description of the agency, survey, and methodology.

Citations are inappropriate or cited incorrectly.
On the Way

The paper provides an adequate descriptionn of the YRBS but is lacking information regarding survey credibility and reliability and a description of the agency, survey, and methodology.

The majority of citations are appropriate and cited correctly.
All the Way

The paper provides a detailed description about YRBS, including: survey credibility and reliability, a description of the agency, survey, and methodology, and utilizes proper citations.
Introduction

1 point
No Way

The paper does NOT provide an introduction and opening paragraph.

The paper does not prepare the reader.
Part Way

The paper provides an introduction OR opening paragraph.

The paper does not prepare the reader.
On the Way

The paper lacks a clear introduction and opening paragraph.

The paper does not totally prepare the reader.
All the Way

The paper provides a clear introduction and opening paragrpah.

The paper fully prepares the reader.

Data Presentation

5 points
No Way

The paper does NOT summarize the YRBS data.

Citations are NOT included.
Part Way

The paper briefly summarizes YRBS data, OR

The paper includes personal opinions, OR

Citations are missing and/or incorrect.
On the Way

The paper summarizes YRBS data but is missing important information.

Citations are included but in wrong format.
All the Way

The paper clearly summarizes YRBS data.

Citations are included and according to technical writing guidelines.
Comparison Analysis

5 points
No Way

The paper does NOT compare and contrast risk behaviors based on gender and grade.
Part Way

The paper compares and contrasts risk behaviors based on gender OR grade.
On the Way

The paper compares and contrasts risk behaviors on gender or grade.

Answers may be in sufficient or lacking in clarity and detail.
All the Way

The paper clearly compares and contrasts risk behaviors based on gender and grade.

Persuasive Argument

4 points
No Way

The paper does not use the YRBS data to develop a strong arugment.
Part Way

The paper utilizes some of the YRBS data to develop an argument for the local school board.

The arugment is weak and lacking direction.
On the Way

The paper uses most of the YRBS data to develop a strong argument for the local school board.

Some personal reflections or opinions are mentioned throughout the paper.
All the Way

The paper utilizes the YRBS data to develop a strong argument for a local school board intended to convince them to plan and implement programs in their schools to address the health problem in question.
Enter Title

2 points
No Way

The paper does NOT include specific recommendations involving health education or other CSHP components.
Part Way

The paper includes recommendations involving health education but does not highlight other CSHP components.
On the Way

The paper includes recommendations involving health education and ONE other CSHP component.
All the Way

The paper provides recommendations involving health education and at least two other CSHP components.

Technical Writing Guidelines

Points that can be subtracted for failing to meet guidelines (Up to 2 points).
No Way

None of the technical guidelines are followed.
Part Way

Half of the technical guidelines are followed (or not followed according to directions)
On the Way

The techincal guidelines are followed but not according to the specific directions.
All the Way

Both of the technical guidelines are followed:
-In addition to the YRBS website, papers must include at least two sources properly cited in AMA or APA style in the text (total of three)
- Referenced on a separate page using AMA/APA style.
Technical Writing Guidelines

Points that can be subtracted for failing to meet guidelines (Up to 4 points).
No Way

None of the technical guidelines are followed.
Part Way

Less than half of the technical guidelines are followed (3/6)
On the Way

The majority of technical guidelines are followed (4/6).
All the Way

All 6 of the technical guidelines are followed:
-Paper text will be 2-3 pages in length.
-Papers will be typed, 1.5 spaced and 12 point font with 1” margins on all sides of 8 1/2” X 11” paper.
-Include all headings.
-Include your name, and the course number on a separate cover page.
-Include completed rubric.
-Correct spelling and grammar.



Keywords:
  • YRBS, data set, health risk behaviors, CSHP, health education

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Add to Gallery

Add to Gallery

Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n232