Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Multilingual Thematic Unit rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Multilingual Thematic Unit 
Rubric Code: A5347
Ready to use
Private Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Thematic Unit
  Exemplary

0.9 pts

Meets Expectations

0.8 pts

Approaching Expectations

0.7 pts

Falls Short of Expectations

0.6 pts

Learner Description
10 %

Exemplary

Description of intended learners and rationale for planned unit are detailed and informative. All relevant information is provided (age, ability level, setting of program, reasons for choosing the theme, etc.)
Meets Expectations

Description of intended learners and rationale for planned unit are included Most relevant information is provided (age, ability level, setting of program, reasons for choosing the theme, etc.)
Approaching Expectations

Description of intended learners and rationale for planned unit may be unclear or incomplete. Some relevant information is missing (age, ability level, setting of program, reasons for choosing the theme, etc.)
Falls Short of Expectations

Description of intended learners and rationale are perfunctory or missing.
Topic/Goals/Objectives
20 %

Exemplary

The goals and objectives are complementary and wholly appropriate to the topic and to the learner. Both language AND content objectives are included. All parts are designed with multilingual learners in mind.
Meets Expectations

The goals and objectives are appropriate to the topic and to the learner. The topic, goals and objectives are designed with multilingual learners in mind. Both language AND content objectives are included.
Approaching Expectations

The goals and objectives match the topic but may need some refinement, or language and content objectives are not clearly defined. The topic, goals and objectives are mostly designed with multilingual learners in mind.
Falls Short of Expectations

The topic, goals and objectives are somewhat designed with multilingual learners in mind, but one or more elements is missing or needs work and/or language and content objectives are missing.
Procedures/Evaluation
20 %

Exemplary

All elements are complementary and selected with goals and objectives in mind. Evaluation criterion are wholly appropriate to the lesson and to the student.
Meets Expectations

All elements are included and are appropriate to goals and objectives; evaluation criterion are suitable to the lesson and to the student.
Approaching Expectations

Most elements are included, but something is missing; Or some element may not be wholly appropriate to the objectives.
Falls Short of Expectations

Several elements are missing; Or one or more elements are not appropriate to the objectives or do not work together to create a complete lesson.
Materials
20 %

Exemplary

Materials are authentic where possible, and are culturally and linguistically appropriate. A materials list is included and all are thoroughly described in the lesson plan.
Meets Expectations

Materials are culturally and linguistically appropriate. A materials list is included. All materials are described in the lesson plan.
Approaching Expectations

Materials are culturally and linguistically appropriate for the most part. A materials list is included. Materials are described in the lesson plan, but description lacks detail.
Falls Short of Expectations

One or more elements is missing; description of materials is missing or perfunctory; or materials listed are inappropriate to the student or to the goals of the lesson.
Activities
20 %

Exemplary

Activities clearly support the academic development of multilingual learners, are linked to student's interests and are appropriate to the learner's level and the objectives of the lesson.
Meets Expectations

Activities are designed with the needs of multilingual learners in mind, demonstrate a link to student's interests and ability levels (as defined in the rationale) and are appropriate to the objectives of the lesson.
Approaching Expectations

Activities are somewhat appropriate but need more attention to better match the student's ability levels or need to focus more on the needs of multilingual learners specifically.
Falls Short of Expectations

Activities are inappropriate to multilingual learners (not consistent with learners' interests/abilities and/or the goals of the lesson).
Editing/Following Guidelines
10 %

Exemplary

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments as provided in syllabus. Editing is consistent and evident throughout; final product is polished and professional. Few to no errors.
Meets Expectations

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments. Editing is consistent and evident throughout; any errors do not detract much from the overall level of professionalism.
Approaching Expectations

May contain several errors or guidelines are inconsistently applied. Editing is mostly consistent but may be unevenly applied, or contains several errors which detract from the overall professionalism.
Falls Short of Expectations

Guidelines for assignments are inconsistently or inaccurately applied. Errors are so numerous as to seriously detract from the professionalism of the assignment.



Keywords:
  • ESL, ELL, ENL, Thematic Unit, world languages

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Add to Gallery

Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n202