Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: L541 Case Study Paper rubric

iRubric: L541 Case Study Paper rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
L541 Case Study Paper 
The purpose of this assignment sequence is to give you experience with developing a case study of a second language writer. For this assignment, you will synthesize the work you have done with your learner throughout this course.
Rubric Code: Z5BW5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Content
  Exemplary

10 pts

Meets Expectations

9 pts

Approaching Expectations

8 pts

Falls Short of Expectations

7 pts

Synthesis of Information
15 %

Exemplary

Information from previous assignments is well-chosen; all elements work together to provide an integrated synthesis that offers readers a case study of your focus learner.
Meets Expectations

Information from previous assignments mostly works together to provide an integrated synthesis of the case study. May need more integration.
Approaching Expectations

Information from previous assignments is included but is not presented as a unified whole. Needs more work to integrate information.
Falls Short of Expectations

Information from previous assignments appears disjointed or is a "cobbling together" of previous assignments. Does not present an integrated synthesis of the case study.
Synthesis of Data
15 %

Exemplary

Data collected from previous study (interview, inventories, tutoring sessions) is integrated throughout and supports analysis.
Meets Expectations

Data from previous study (interview, inventories, tutoring sessions) is included, but needs to be more fully incorporated throughout the report.
Approaching Expectations

Data from previous study (interview, inventories, tutoring sessions) is included, but appears somewhat disjointed or is not incorporated throughout the report.
Falls Short of Expectations

Data from previous study (interview, inventories, tutoring sessions) is perfunctory or not included; information appears disjointed or is not incorporated throughout the report.
Professionalism
15 %

Exemplary

The tone of the report is formal and applies a critical perspective to the examples, explanations and research data consistent with practitioners in the field.
Meets Expectations

The tone of the report is formal; attempts at applying a critical perspective to the examples, explanations and research data were largely successful and applied throughout.
Approaching Expectations

The tone of the report is formal; attempts at applying a critical perspective to the examples, explanations and research data are somewhat successful and mostly applied throughout.
Falls Short of Expectations

The tone of the report lacks formality; or attempts at applying a critical perspective to the information are perfunctory; lacks application of a critical perspective throughout most of the work.
Learner Description
10 %

Exemplary

A thorough summary of the learner's characteristics is included and serves as evidence for all tutoring decisions.
Meets Expectations

A summary of the learner's characteristics is included as evidence for most tutoring decisions.
Approaching Expectations

A summary of the learner's characteristics is included but needs elaboration; summary serves as evidence for some tutoring decisions.
Falls Short of Expectations

A summary of the learner's characteristics is not included or is perfunctory; summary is given but not as evidence for tutoring decisions.
Tutoring Experience
10 %

Exemplary

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are integrated and described with rich detail; this element is well-balanced with the rest of the paper.
Meets Expectations

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are described in detail but needs more editing to balance the amount of description with the rest of the paper.
Approaching Expectations

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are described with some detail; more attention to the balance between description and the rest of the paper is needed.
Falls Short of Expectations

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are described inadequately or in too much detail. This information is not well-balanced within the assignment as a whole.
Instructional Recommendations
15 %

Exemplary

Recommendations for future instruction are described in detail, clearly linked to the learner's characteristics and supported through references to research literature.
Meets Expectations

Recommendations for future instruction are included; link between recommendations and the learner is mostly clear and supported by relevant literature.
Approaching Expectations

Recommendations for future instruction are included but need more detail; link between recommendations and the learner is somewhat clear or needs more support from relevant literature.
Falls Short of Expectations

Recommendations for future instruction are perfunctory or absent; link between recommendations and the learner is unclear or unsupported by relevant literature.
Formatting/Editing
Formatting/Following Guidelines
10 %

Exemplary

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments as provided in syllabus. APA formatting is accurate and and consistently applied throughout, including title page and references.
Meets Expectations

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments as provided in syllabus. APA formatting is mostly correct and and applied throughout, including title page and references.
Approaching Expectations

An evident attempt was made to follow APA style guidelines but the paper contains several errors or guidelines are inconsistently applied.
Falls Short of Expectations

APA style guidelines have not been followed or are inconsistently applied. Guidelines for assignments as described in the syllabus are inconsistently or inaccurately applied.
Editing
5 %

Exemplary

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; final product is polished and professional. Few to no errors.
Meets Expectations

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; may contain a few errors but these do not detract much from the overall level of professionalism.
Approaching Expectations

Editing is mostly consistent but may be unevenly applied, or paper contains several errors which detract from the overall professionalism.
Falls Short of Expectations

Editing is inconsistent or unevenly applied throughout the entire paper. Grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors are so numerous as to seriously detract from the professionalism of the paper.
Appendices
5 %

Exemplary

All appendices are attached to the document, appropriately labeled, and are in the same document (not in a separate file).
Meets Expectations

All appendices are attached to the document and are in the same document (not in a separate file).
Approaching Expectations

Most appendices are attached to the document, but may be mislabeled, or some documents are not included in the file, but are provided in a separate file.
Falls Short of Expectations

Appendices are missing, unlabeled, or not attached to the final document as required.



Keywords:
  • Grad, ESL, ELL, ENL, Case Study, L541

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n178