Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: P251 Theories of learning rubric

iRubric: P251 Theories of learning rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
P251 Theories of learning rubric 
P251 theories of learning assignment
Rubric Code: Z529X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Part I Thesis statement
  Poor

12 pts

Fair

14 pts

Good

16 pts

Exemplary

20 pts

Explanation of theory

Poor

Identification of learning theory based on the example provided is not compelling and does not use evidence.

Explanation of how learn occurs according to theory is inaccurate and unclear with many misconceptions.
Fair

Identification of learning theory based on the example provided is fairly compelling and uses some reliable and relevant evidence.

Explanation of how learn occurs according to theory is fairly accurate and clear with several misconceptions.
Good

Identification of learning theory based on the example provided is somewhat compelling and uses relatively reliable and relevant evidence.

Explanation of how learn occurs according to theory is accurate and clear with one misconception.
Exemplary

Identification of learning theory based on the example provided is compelling and uses reliable and relevant evidence.

Explanation of how learn occurs according to theory is highly accurate and clear with no mistakes.
Part II Description of lesson
  Poor

12 pts

Fair

14 pts

Good

16 pts

Exemplary

20 pts

Description of lesson

Poor

No analysis of the theories of learning explaining how observations support claims about theory of learning.Description is missing most, if not all of the following: purpose of the lesson, how the teacher instructed, the resources that were offered for the children, and how students engage content.

Description is unclear, lacks details, and does not demonstrate connection to school experience.
Fair

Description includes most but missing two of the following: purpose of the lesson, how the teacher instructed, the resources that were offered for the children, and how students engage content.

Description is fairly clear, quite detailed, and demonstrates fair connection to school experience.
Good

Description includes most but missing one of the following: purpose of the lesson, how the teacher instructed, the resources that were offered for the children, and how students engage content.

Description is somewhat clear and detailed, and demonstrates some connection to school experience.
Exemplary

Description includes ALL of the following: purpose of the lesson, how the teacher instructed, the resources that were offered for the children, and how students engage content.

Description is clear, very detailed, and well-connected to school experience.
Part III Analysis
  Poor

15 pts

Fair

17 pts

Good

20 pts

Exemplary

25 pts

Analysis of learning theories

Poor

Little to no articulation of relationship between claims, observations and theory of learning. The big ideas are unoriginal and unsupported by examples
Fair

Fair articulation of relationship between claims, observations and theory of learning. The big ideas are unoriginal and supported by few meaningful examples.
Good

Moderate to well-articulated relationship between claims, observations and theory of learning. The big ideas are discussed in own words and supported by some meaningful examples which reflect original thinking.
Exemplary

Explicit articulation of relationship between claims, observations and theory of learning. The big ideas are discussed in own words and supported by meaningful examples which reflect original thinking.
Support of claims

Poor

No support of claims, or extensive use of opinions.
Fair

Minimal details of and/or ambiguous support of claims. Minimal use of readings and facts to describe and support claims.
Good

Clear, detailed, and justified support of claims. Moderate use of readings and accurate facts to describe and support claims.
Exemplary

Substantive, insightful, detailed, clear, and justified support of claims. Extensive use of readings and accurate facts to describe and support claims.
Part IV Organization
  Poor

6 pts

Fair

7 pts

Good

8 pts

Exemplary

10 pts

Format and organization

Poor

Article falls short on all the required criteria of proper citation, organization, length, and correct grammar/ spelling.
Fair

Article falls short on more than one of the required criteria of proper citation, organization, length, and correct grammar/ spelling.
Good

Article meets most of required criteria of proper citation, organization, length, and largely free of grammar and spelling errors.
Exemplary

Article meets all required criteria of proper citation, organization, length, grammar and spelling errors.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n98