Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Ethics Case Study rubric

iRubric: Ethics Case Study rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Ethics Case Study 
Ethics Case Study
This is a rubric for the U547 Ethics Case Study assignment
Rubric Code: Z4C63
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Ethics Case Study
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Application of Theory to Practice
25 %

Ability to identify and appropriately apply theory to your practice - this is where you will be intentional with your practice
Poor

No application of theory to practice was used or it was used incorrectly.
Fair

Little application of theory was used in your case analysis. No explanation regrading how the theories work together was included.
Good

Theory was applied to your case analysis. The aspect of the theory that was being applied wasn't clear. Little explanation regarding how the theories work together to frame the response was provided.
Excellent

Theories were applied that addressed the specific issues outlined. The aspect of the theory that informed your analysis was clearly articulated.
Justification for Action
20 %

A clear justification for action selected based on supporting research or theories
Poor

Justification for action is unclear or missing
Fair

Justification for action is present but not very clear
Good

Justification for action is clear but is not based on supporting research or theories
Excellent

Justification for action is clear and is based on supporting research or theories
Perspective of SA Professional
15 %

Ability to of SA Professional facilitate this assignment from the perspective of a student affairs professional in both written assignment & classroom discussion.
Poor

Very little or no evidence of a student affairs professional's perspective to the case analysis
Fair

Some evidence of a student affairs professional's perspective to the case analysis, but important points are missing.
Good

The student affairs professional's perspective to the case analysis is present but has a few holes in the argument
Excellent

Excellent blend of the student affairs professional's prospective when considering the case analysis.
Content
10 %

Poor

No information related to the central issues in the case or the decisions that need to be made are presented. The introduction does not show an understanding of the case.
Fair

Little information is provided related to the issues in the case or the decisions that need to be made.
Good

The general information related to the central issues in the case are included. The decision(s) that need to be made are not clear. Little direction is given to the reader to understand the organization of how the response will be presented.
Excellent

Introduction to the case study clearly articulates the central issues in the case. The decision(s) that need to made are clearly stated. The organization of how the response will be presented is also included.
Literature
10 %

Thoroughness in identifying a response that is grounded in the literature.
Poor

Little or no use of class literature
Fair

Sources are used but stand alone as separate entities and are not synthesized
Good

Sources are used and synthesized a bit, though the connection to supporting your rationale is not as strong as it could be
Excellent

Several sources are cited, they back up the argument for your rationale, and they are well synthesized to provide multiple perspectives
Clarity of Writing
10 %

This involves clear, concise writing that provides a logical flow for the reader.
Poor

Writing is unclear and has several typos or grammar problems.
Fair

Some typos and a general lack of clarity to the writing
Good

Demonstrates decent writing with very few typos and few issues with clarity
Excellent

Free of errors and grammar problems with a very clear writing style
Citation: APA
10 %

Poor

Copies material without citing sources.
Fair

Does not give credit to most sources.

Uses improper format for citing sources.
Good

Gives credit to most sources.

Uses proper format for citing format with minor errors.
Excellent

Gives credit to all sources.

Uses proper format for citing sources.



Keywords:
  • wiki



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n98