Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Writing Analysis E339 2015 rubric

iRubric: Writing Analysis E339 2015 rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Writing Analysis E339 2015 
Writing Analysis E342 2013
Benchmark assignment for E339 Reading and Language Arts Methods: Writing Analysis
Rubric Code: Y5BWB
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Writing Anaysis
  Exemplary

1 pts

Satisfactory

0.85 pts

Common Pitfalls

0.7 pts

Missing or Incomplete

0 pts

Analysis of Writing
Making Meaning
0.5 pts

Exemplary

Writer's meaning and strengths are clearly articulated.
Satisfactory

Writer's meaning and strengths are somewhat articulated.
Common Pitfalls

Writer's meaning and strengths are not clearly articulated.
Missing or Incomplete

Missing or Incomplete
Craft of Writing
0.5 pts

Exemplary

Strengths are highlighted and explained in detail; focused on crafts of writing and not punctuation/spelling.
Satisfactory

Strengths are highlighted and explained generally.
Common Pitfalls

Strengths are mentioned but little description given.
Missing or Incomplete

Missing or Incomplete
Punctuation and Syntax
0.5 pts

Exemplary

Strength identified and explained in terms of punctuation/syntax; appropriate next step explained in detail.
Satisfactory

Strength identified and explained in terms of punctuation/syntax; not clear how next step is related to analysis or not explained in detail.
Common Pitfalls

Strength identified and explained in terms of punctuation/syntax; spelling stage incorrect; confusing next step; weak match between analysis and focus for instruction.
Missing or Incomplete

Missing or Incomplete
Spelling/Orthographics
1 pts

Exemplary

Strength identified and explained in terms of spelling strategies; identified correct spelling stage; appropriate next step explained in detail.
Satisfactory

Strength identified and explained in terms of spelling strategies; identified spelling stage but may not be correct; not clear how next step is related to analysis or not explained in detail.
Common Pitfalls

Strength identified but not explained in terms of spelling strategies; spelling stage incorrect; confusing next step; weak match between analysis and focus for instruction.
Missing or Incomplete

Missing or Incomplete
6+1 Traits of Writing Rubric
1 pts

Exemplary

Rubric thoroughly filled out; comments use academic/professional language; detailed explanations
Satisfactory

Rubric filled out; comments use some academic/professional language; vague explanations
Common Pitfalls

Rubric filled out; limited comments; little detail on explanations
Missing or Incomplete

Missing or Incomplete
Writing Instruction
Mentor Texts
1.25 pts

Exemplary

Two appropriate mentor texts selected; thorough description of how the texts would be used with the child with detailed explanation; connected to previous analyses (should NOT focus on conventions or spelling)
Satisfactory

Two appropriate mentor texts selected; some description of how the texts would be used with the child; provides a detailed explanation; somewhat connected to previous analyses (should NOT focus on conventions or spelling)
Common Pitfalls

Two mentor texts selected but not appropriate for child; almost no description of how the texts would be used with the child; little connection to previous analyses
Missing or Incomplete

Missing or Incomplete
Reflection
0.75 pts

Exemplary

Insightful reflection and explanation that reveal specific connections between reading and writing analyses; concrete evidence used to support reflection
Satisfactory

Reflection and explanation reveal some connections between reading and writing analyses; some evidence provided
Common Pitfalls

Vague reflection and explanation; little/no evidence provided
Missing or Incomplete

Missing or Incomplete
Recommendation
0.5 pts

Exemplary

Recommendation focuses on strength and then next step for the writer; very specific in terms of concrete next steps for the writer; use of child friendly language
Satisfactory

Recommendation focuses on strength and then next step for the writer; vague in terms of next steps for the writer; use of child friendly language
Common Pitfalls

Recommendation is missing strength and/or next step; vague language
Missing or Incomplete

Missing or Incomplete




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16