iRubric: X470/L502 Reading Autobiography rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
X470/L502 Reading Autobiography X470/L502 Reading Autobiography Prof. Serafin Coronel- Molina Socio-/Psycholinguistic Applications to Reading Instruction Rubric Code: X5AAB Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Reading Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Reading Autobiography Rubric Descriptions Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts	Excellent 7 pts
Content 65 pts Enter description	Poor Information and evidence are missing. The connections between and among ideas are not evident. There is no introduction/ conclusion.	Fair Information and evidence are appropriate and integrated to a certain extent. Connections between and among ideas are evident but not clearly made. Introduction/ conclusion are not clear enough.	Good Information and evidence are appropriate and integrated effectively. Connections between and among ideas are made. There is introduction and conclusion.	Excellent Information and evidence are appropriate and integrated outstandingly. Excellent Connections between and among ideas are made. The introduction and conclusion are robust.
Organization 15 pts Enter description	Poor Unclear organization or organizational plan is inappropriate.	Fair Some signs of logical organization. Transitions are mostly appropriate. Sequence of ideas could be improved	Good Fully and imaginatively written. Sequence of ideas is effective. Transitions are effective.	Excellent Fully and imaginatively written. Sequence of ideas is very effective. Transitions are outstanding.
Formatting 10 pts Enter description	Poor No consideration of the APA format and the guidelines of the assignment.	Fair Some APA formatting is missing and does not follow the guidelines of the assignment appropriately.	Good Follows the APA format and guidelines of the assignment.	Excellent Strictly follows the APA format and guidelines of the assignment.
Resources 10 pts	Poor No bibliographical sources were included and no connections were made to their experiences.	Fair Some bibliographic sources are missing and connections are not made appropriately.	Good Two required bibliographic sources are cited successfully and adequate connections are made to their experiences.	Excellent Two required bibliographic sources are cited successfully and insightful connections are made to their experiences and teaching practices.