Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Account of Your Own Story rubric

iRubric: Account of Your Own Story rubric


(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Account of Your Own Story 
Rubric for assignment that tells the story of your undergraduate developmnt.
Rubric Code: X493C
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric C565 Issue Paper
  Exemplary

5 pts

Meritorious

4 pts

Satisfactory

3 pts

Marginal

2 pts

Failing

1 pts

Introduction
20 %

Exemplary

-Topic of the paper is clearly introduced
-How the topic connects to higher education and student affairs in addressed
-Proper citations are used to frame the issue.
-An organizational statement/thesis is included.
Meritorious

-The general topic to be discussed is introduced and a connection is made to higher education.
-Citations are used to frame the issue, but need to be further defined.
-Organizational statement/thesis is included
-The focus of the introduction could be clearer.
Satisfactory

-The topic is introduced but is too broad to determine what specifically will be discussed in the paper.
-Some citations exist to support the topic
-The issue to be discussed has not been fully developed
Marginal

-A general topic is introduced, however the introduction fails to connect the ideas to higher education and student affairs
-The focus of the paper is unclear
-Lack of citations to support the issue
Failing

-Introduction does not clearly identify the topic that is being discussed
-No citations are provided to support the issue
-Lack of organizational statement/thesis
Clarity of Writing
10 %

Exemplary

-Few or no grammatical errors, spelling, and/or punctuation
-The writing does not ramble
-The writer provides examples and quotes that answers the reader's questions and add depth to the writer's ideas being presented
-Paper is carefully written and edited
Meritorious

-Some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation
-Paper shows some signs of editing, but needs more
-Thoughts are concise but could be connected together better.
Satisfactory

-The point trying to be conveyed is not clear to the reader
-Paragraph or sentence structure is repetitive
-Quotations are used appropriately, but create awkward sentences
Marginal

-The paper lacks flow and is difficult to follow
-Writing rambles indicating the paper has not been carefully edited
Failing

It is difficult to understand what the writer is trying to express.
Content
30 %

Exemplary

-The content is appropriately covered without being redundant
-The writer uses appropriate sources to back up statements in the pro/con arguement
-A pro/con arguement are provided including the evidence to support the claims
-The writer balances their own voice with the evidence
-Main ideas stand out, along with details. Ideas in the paper are compelling
-The paper flows from one paragraph to the next in an organized paper
Meritorious

-Lack of evidence exists to support the points being made by the writer
-The significance to higher education and student affairs is not evident
-Ideas are clear but more information is needed
-The flow of the paper could be improved, transitions between paragraphs are missing
Satisfactory

-A pro and con arguement were presented but lacked the apppropriate evidence to support the claims
Marginal

-The writer has omitted sections of the content or content runs on excessively
-The paper lacks both a pro and con arguement
Failing

The paper does not present a pro and con agruement to the issue presented in the introduction
Conclusions
30 %

Exemplary

-The writer makes succinct and precise conclusions based on the pro and con arguement provided
-The evidence provided in the body of the paper supports all the conclusions made by the writer
-Insights into the problem/topic are appropriate
-Citations are used to support the claims
Meritorious

-The writer provides concluding remarks
-Aspects of the conclusion are not supported with citations
Satisfactory

-A conclusion is provided related to the information shared in the content
-The conclusion lacks the citations to make the connections between the content and the final decision by the writer
Marginal

-New information is presented in the conclusion that was not discussed in the content
-Conclusions are grounded in information that was not presented in the paper
Failing

The paper does not include a conclusion based on the evidence presented.
Use of APA/Sources
10 %

Exemplary

-All necessary citations are provided in the body of the text and the reference section
-Accurately adheres to APA style in formatting, organization, and construction
-The appropriate number of references are used including a referred journal
Meritorious

-Minor errors in the formatting of the citations
-The appropriate number of references are used including a referred journal
Satisfactory

-Most sources are schlarly and relevant
-More attention needs to be paid to formatting APA citations and references
Marginal

-Citations are not done properly and require major editing
-Paper lacks the appropriate number of citations
Failing

The paer does not follow APA guidelines for in text citations or references




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

n98