Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Staffing Structures & Budget Development rubric

iRubric: Staffing Structures & Budget Development rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Staffing Structures & Budget Development 
Staffing Structures & Budget Development
The assignment provides a mock sense of what is required to develop a budget for a multifaceted auxiliary department.
Rubric Code: W4A78
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Poor

Only a few or no components of the assignment were achieved.

1 pts

Fair

Many components of the assignment were achieved.

2 pts

Good

All components of the assignment were achieved.

3 pts

Campus Description
5 %

Enter criteria description
Poor

The type of campus was not fully described.
Fair

A clear description of the campus was not provided. One or more elements were missing regarding the type of institution.
Good

A clear description of the campus was provided to give context for the facilities budget.
Functional Area Selection
5 %

Enter criteria description
Poor

The type of functional area was not identified and you did not indicate the size of the facility or what was included within the facility
Fair

You were able to identify the functional area, however the size of your facilty and/or the components within the facility were not clearly articulated.
Good

You clearly identified the type of functional area, identified the size of the facility(s), and the components wihin your facility(s).
Staffing Structure
5 %

Enter criteria description
Poor

No staffing structure was defined.
Fair

You identified an outline of your staffing strcuture, but all levels were not clarified and/or the various positions were not justified in the rationale.
Good

You clearly articulated all levels of the staffing structured with a justifying rationale.
Budget Model
5 %

Poor

No budgetary model was identified.
Fair

You identified a model, however you did not cite the model or clearly explain your model choice.
Good

You clearly idenfied a budgetary model, cited the model and explain why you used that model to develop your budget.
Outline of Budget Components
15 %

Poor

You either did not provide an outline of your budgetary components or they were not justified or cited appropriately.
Fair

You described most components of your budget structure, but you either did not provide adquate justification for the decisions you made and/or you did not cite outside sources.
Good

You fully described all components of your budget stucture, provided appropriate justifications for your decisions and cited outside sources where necessary.
Outline of Funding Sources
15 %

Poor

You did not provide adequate information on the various funding sources for your unit.
Fair

You described most of the funding sources, but your description was not clear and/or you did not fully describe what you would do with any extra income.
Good

You fully described the various funding sources, your income either met or exceeded your expenses, and you also provided an explanation for how you would spend any extra income beyond the base costs to run your operation.
Formulas
15 %

Poor

Either there were no formulas, or the formulas were inaccurate.
Fair

The formulas used to determine costs had errors or did not otherwise make sense; the rationale did not seem to explain the reason for why a certain forumla was used.
Good

The formulas used to determine costs provided a solid connection between the numbers in the budget worksheet and the words outlined in the rationale.
Budget Worksheet
35 %

Poor

The budget worksheet was difficult to read, had a good number of mathematical errors, and the connections to points raised in the rationale were difficult to understand.
Fair

The budget worksheet was not easy to read, there were some math errors, and the connections to points raised in the rationale were not easy to understand.
Good

The budget worksheet was easy to read, the math was accurate, and the connections to the points raised in the rationale was clear.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n98