Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: TAL MGRP Feature Article rubric

iRubric: TAL MGRP Feature Article rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
TAL MGRP Feature Article 
MGRP Feature Article
Rubric Code: U54C2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric MGRP
  Exemplary

2 pts

Acceptable

1.5 pts

Developing

1 pts

Unacceptable

0.5 pts

Writing Process

Exemplary

Fully engaged in the writing process by submitting proposal with essential questions, rational and references, submitting complete draft for feedback and evidence of revisions in final publication.
Acceptable

Submitted proposal with some questions, rational, and some references. Draft submitted for feedback that was partially complete and evidence of revisions in final publication.
Developing

Submitted proposal that included two of required content: rational, questions or references. Draft submitted that contained limited engagement with topic or limited revision of draft attempted.
Unacceptable

No proposal or draft submitted.
Introduction/Lead

Exemplary

Introduction is framed around essential question or rational for topic relevance. A hook/lead is crafted that draws the reader into the topic. There is a clear transition to the rest of the paper.
Acceptable

Introduction is framed around essential question or rational for topic. It is missing a hook/lead.
Developing

Introduction is a list of facts and there is no hook or lead.
Unacceptable

No introduction.
Clear point of view

Exemplary

Paper is written with a clear point of view or essential question in mind. This is communicated throughout the paper.
Acceptable

Paper is written with a vague point of view that is mentioned or hinted in introduction and it is unclear how the rest of the paper supported this stance.
Developing

Paper is written with little connection to larger essential question or point of view. Difficult for the reader to determine "the point" of the article.
Unacceptable

No essential question. Paper is made up of unconnected facts about the topic.
Conclusion

Exemplary

The conclusion of engaging and relates in some way to the introduction and essential question. The conclusion gives the reader something to take away from the paper.
Acceptable

Conclusion summarizes the paper in general. No evidence of crafting a conclusion.
Developing

Conclusion restates exactly what you said in the introduction.
Unacceptable

No conclusion. Paper just ends.
Body & Organization

Exemplary

Writing integrates source material and provides supporting detail sentences that develop main points and create a sense of flow. Paragraphs creatively examine and connect ideas.
Acceptable

Each paragraph has supporting detail sentences the develop main ideas. There is some flow/connection between paragraphs.
Developing

Individual paragraphs are not focused. There is little flow between paragraphs. Ideas seem to be presented randomly.
Unacceptable

Paper is not cohesive. There is no flow between paragraphs or ideas. The paper is "all over the place" and difficult to follow.
Mechanics

Exemplary

Spelling, punctuation, and grammar used consistently and creatively.
Acceptable

A few errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar that do not detract from meaning of paper.
Developing

Significant errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar.
Unacceptable

Major errors in spelling, punctuation and grammar that detract from meaning.
Research & Evidence

Exemplary

Evidence reflects professional sources integrated with other sources (interview, media, etc.). Research information goes beyond surface information. Evidence is relevant, varied and reliable.
Acceptable

Evidence is provided and reflects both professional and other sources. Research information is mostly surface information that often reveals a shallow understanding of topic. Evidence is relevant, varied and reliable.
Developing

Evidence is provided but may come from a single source. Lack of sources raises questions about the reliability of information or information is dominated by popular or your own opinion.
Unacceptable

Little or no evidence of research.
Bibliography

Exemplary

All cited works in the bibliography are in the correct APA format. Sources include 3 professional articles as well as other sources.
Acceptable

Most cited works in the bibliography are in the correct APA format. Three professional sources are included.
Developing

Bibliography is included but is not in correct APA format.
Unacceptable

Bibliography is missing.
Genre Pieces and Class Presentation

Exemplary

At least 2 distinct genres that make sense for the topic; provide deeper meaning; genres work together to extend research and point of views
Acceptable

Two distinct genres that show different aspects of research; one may lack depth reflecting only superficial level of information or point of view
Developing

Two genres; show only superficial parts of research; genres do not reveal new insights apart from paper; lack of sense of thoughtfulness in selection of genre
Unacceptable

Less than 2 genre pieces or choices of genre that distract from rather than enhance understanding of topic; little evidence of crafting to meet conventions of chosen genre
Summary and Reflection

Exemplary

Clear explanation and rational for choice of genres. Reflection includes detailed insights and implications supported by evidence of engagement in the MGRP process.
Acceptable

Explanation of choice for genres and reflection that includes some insights into the MGRP process.
Developing

Explanation of genre choices shows lack of understanding about how genres extend the topic. Reflection is clique and shows little insight into MGRP process.
Unacceptable

Missing summary or reflection.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n178