Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Making Meaning of Theory to Practice in Student Affairs rubric

iRubric: Making Meaning of Theory to Practice in Student Affairs rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Making Meaning of Theory to Practice in Student Affairs 
Making Meaning of Theory to Practice in Student Affairs
This assignment is a way for students to reflect on how they are beginning to make meaning of what they are learning in the classroom and how that applies to their paraprofessional position in the field.
Rubric Code: R498X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Making Meaning Rubric
  Exceptional

10 pts

Meritorious

9 pts

Satisfactory

8 pts

Marginal

7 pts

Failing

6 pts

Content & Discussion
20 %

Exceptional

All aspects of the assignment have been included. The introduction was strong and included a clear organizational statement was presented. The paper followed that organization and included a conclusion connected those ideas.
Meritorious

The majority of the aspects in the assignment were included. The organizational statement needs to be clearer. The points presented generally followed the organizational statement.
Satisfactory

The major points are addressed and some research was conducted to provide evidence for the conclusions. The paper lacks a clear organizational statement. The structure of the paper is not clear.
Marginal

Major points are addressed, but not well supported or discussed. Little evidence was provided to support the claims.
Failing

Major points are lacking or not all included. The aspects to be included in the paper were poorly discussed.
Theory to Practice
40 %

Exceptional

Evidence from the literature is used to support your own ideas related to theory to practice. A clear balance between your own ideas and the literature is presented.The reader understands how you are making meaning of theory to practice. Conclusions are supported by the body of the paper.
Meritorious

It is generally clear about how you are making meaning of theory to practice. Some evidence is used to support your ideas. The reader is left with more questions about how you are processing the information rather than understanding that aspect from your perspective. The conclusions are supported by the majority of points presented. Although new information is presented in the conclusion that was not addressed in the overall paper.
Satisfactory

Little supporting evidence was provided for how you are making meaning of theory to practice. The conclusion does not bring together the points that were addressed in the paper, rather it restates those ideas.
Marginal

It was not clear how you made meaning of theory to practice. The ideas presented were not well organized and didn't connect back to the literature. The conclusion is not clear and didn't bring together the points you were addressing.
Failing

How you have made meaning of theory to practice is not addressed. The paper rambles and includes multiple references that do not connect to a main point. Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition.
Philosophy of Student Affaris
20 %

Exceptional

A clear statement regarding your current philosophy of student affairs practice was included. Connections between your own philosophy and the literature were outlined to demonstrate how that philosophy was developed.
Meritorious

A philosophy of student affairs is included. It is not clear how the philosophy connects to the literature.
Satisfactory

The philosophy presented is not clear and doesn't show a connection to the literature.
Marginal

A reference to a philosophy is provided but the philosophy itself is not clearly presented.
Failing

No Philosophy of Student Affairs was included.
Technical Aspects
20 %

Exceptional

The writing is clear and individual thoughts are easy to follow. Paper contains no obvious errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling. APA was followed for both in text citations and the resource section.
Meritorious

The writing is generally clear, but could use improvement in a few areas. Paper contains 1-2 grammatical, and a few punctuation and spelling errors. Few errors in the APA formatting.
Satisfactory

The writing tends to ramble and the points are not clear. The paper contains more that a couple grammatical errors.
Marginal

The writing rambles and ideas do not connect. The paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
Failing

The paper is not well written and contains grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors throughout.



Keywords:
  • Writing



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16