Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: L541 Reflection Paper rubric

iRubric: L541 Reflection Paper rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
L541 Reflection Paper 
Reflection Paper v2
The purpose of this assignment sequence is to give you experience with developing a case study of a second language writer. For this assignment, choose Option A or B as described in the Assignments Overview and write a paper that describes the strategies you read about and how they can be applied to your learner.
Rubric Code: P5BW4
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Content
  Exemplary

5 pts

Meets Expectations

4 pts

Approaching Expectations

3 pts

Falls Short of Expectations

2 pts

Synthesis of Information
30 %

Exemplary

Information from articles is well-integrated; all references to appropriate literature are carefully chosen and applied to the learner's situation in a reflective manner.
Meets Expectations

Includes information from all articles and discussion of their relevance to the focus learner. Information is mostly well presented to provide a balance of research and the learner's situation.
Approaching Expectations

Includes relevant research and discussion of the focus learner, but lacks balance between the two. Needs more attention to integrating the two aspects to present a well-integrated paper.
Falls Short of Expectations

Includes some relevant research and/or discussion of the learner, but is incomplete. Research and learner's situation are presented separately instead of being integrated.
Research-based
30 %

Exemplary

Includes references to at least 5 journal articles relevant to the goals of the assignment. (A: writing strategies, or B: teacher feedback).
Meets Expectations

Includes references to 5 journal articles. The articles are relevant to the goals of the assignment. (A: writing strategies, or B: teacher feedback).
Approaching Expectations

Includes references to 5 journal articles. Articles lack relevance to the goals of the assignment. (A: writing strategies, or B: teacher feedback).
Falls Short of Expectations

References to fewer than 5 articles are included, or included articles are not relevance to the assignment. (A: writing strategies, or B: teacher feedback).
Progress Chart
20 %

Exemplary

The chart is based on the goals of the lessons and is well designed to track the progress of the focus learner. Rationale for how the chart functions to track the goals of the lesson plan is included.
Meets Expectations

The chart tracks the progress of the focus learner and includes some rationale for how the chart functions to track the goals of the lesson plan.
Approaching Expectations

The chart needs more work to clearly track the progress of the focus learner. Some rationale is included, but may need further explication.
Falls Short of Expectations

The chart needs more work to clearly track the progress of the focus learner. Rationale is perfunctory or missing; needs further explication to make the link clear.
Organization/Editing
Organization
8 %

Exemplary

Very well-organized and clearly developed. All parts are cohesive and clearly connected.
Meets Expectations

Paper demonstrates suitable organization and is cohesive.
Approaching Expectations

Somewhat organized, but needs further development to create a cohesive assignment that connects all parts of the paper.
Falls Short of Expectations

Paper lacks organization or the parts are presented in isolation with little or no attempt to provide a cohesive whole.
Formatting/Following Guidelines
6 %

Exemplary

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments as provided in syllabus. APA formatting is accurate and and consistently applied throughout.
Meets Expectations

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments as provided in syllabus. APA formatting is mostly correct (1-2 small errors) and consistently applied throughout.
Approaching Expectations

An evident attempt was made to follow APA style guidelines but the paper contains several errors or guidelines are inconsistently applied.
Falls Short of Expectations

APA style guidelines have not been followed or are inconsistently applied. Guidelines for assignments are inconsistently or inaccurately applied.
Editing/Mechanics
6 %

Exemplary

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; final product is polished and professional. Few to no errors.
Meets Expectations

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; may contain a few errors but these do not detract much from the overall level of professionalism.
Approaching Expectations

Editing is mostly consistent but may be unevenly applied, or contains several errors which detract from the overall professionalism of the paper.
Falls Short of Expectations

Editing is inconsistent or unevenly applied throughout the entire paper. Grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors are so numerous as to seriously detract from the professionalism of the paper.



Keywords:
  • Grad, ESL, ELL, ENL, Reflection, Writing, L541

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n202