Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: L541 Case Study Presentation rubric

iRubric: L541 Case Study Presentation rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
L541 Case Study Presentation 
L541 Case Study Paper
For this assignment, you will create a digital presentation of your case study report, using the platform or app of your choice. Your presentation should be no more than 10 minutes long and should include voice recording as well as visual elements.
Rubric Code: M5BW7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Content -
The following elements from your written report should be included.
  Exemplary

10 pts

Meets Expectations

9 pts

Approaching Expectations

8 pts

Falls Short of Expectations

7 pts

Synthesis of Information
10 %

Exemplary

Information from previous assignments is well-chosen; all elements work together to provide an integrated synthesis that offers readers a case study of your focus learner.
Meets Expectations

Information from previous assignments mostly works together to provide an integrated synthesis of the case study. May need more integration.
Approaching Expectations

Information from previous assignments is included but is not presented as a unified whole. Needs more work to integrate information.
Falls Short of Expectations

Information from previous assignments appears disjointed or is a "cobbling together" of previous assignments. Does not present an integrated synthesis of the case study.
Synthesis of Data
10 %

Exemplary

Data collected from previous study (interview, inventories, tutoring sessions) is integrated throughout and supports analysis.
Meets Expectations

Data from previous study (interview, inventories, tutoring sessions) is included, but needs to be more fully incorporated throughout the report.
Approaching Expectations

Data from previous study (interview, inventories, tutoring sessions) is included, but appears somewhat disjointed or is not incorporated throughout the report.
Falls Short of Expectations

Data from previous study (interview, inventories, tutoring sessions) is perfunctory or not included; information appears disjointed or is not incorporated throughout the report.
Learner Description
10 %

Exemplary

A thorough summary of the learner's characteristics is included and serves as evidence for all tutoring decisions.
Meets Expectations

A summary of the learner's characteristics is included as evidence for most tutoring decisions.
Approaching Expectations

A summary of the learner's characteristics is included but needs elaboration; summary serves as evidence for some tutoring decisions.
Falls Short of Expectations

A summary of the learner's characteristics is not included or is perfunctory; summary is given but not as evidence for tutoring decisions.
Tutoring Experience
10 %

Exemplary

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are integrated and described with rich detail; this element is well-balanced with the rest of the paper.
Meets Expectations

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are described in detail but needs more editing to balance the amount of description with the rest of the paper.
Approaching Expectations

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are described with some detail; more attention to the balance between description and the rest of the paper is needed.
Falls Short of Expectations

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are described inadequately or in too much detail. This information is not well-balanced within the assignment as a whole.
Instructional Recommendations
10 %

Exemplary

Recommendations for future instruction are described in detail, clearly linked to the learner's characteristics and supported through references to research literature.
Meets Expectations

Recommendations for future instruction are included; link between recommendations and the learner is mostly clear and supported by relevant literature.
Approaching Expectations

Recommendations for future instruction are included but need more detail; link between recommendations and the learner is somewhat clear or needs more support from relevant literature.
Falls Short of Expectations

Recommendations for future instruction are perfunctory or absent; link between recommendations and the learner is unclear or unsupported by relevant literature.
Formatting/Editing
The following elements will be considered as well.
Professionalism
5 %

Exemplary

The tone of the report is formal and applies a critical perspective to the examples, explanations and research data consistent with practitioners in the field.
Meets Expectations

The tone of the report is formal; attempts at applying a critical perspective to the examples, explanations and research data were largely successful and applied throughout.
Approaching Expectations

The tone of the report is formal; attempts at applying a critical perspective to the examples, explanations and research data are somewhat successful and mostly applied throughout.
Falls Short of Expectations

The tone of the report lacks formality; or attempts at applying a critical perspective to the information are perfunctory; lacks application of a critical perspective throughout most of the work.
Editing
5 %

Exemplary

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; final product is polished and professional. Few to no errors.
Meets Expectations

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; may contain a few errors but these do not detract much from the overall level of professionalism.
Approaching Expectations

Editing is mostly consistent but may be unevenly applied, or paper contains several errors which detract from the overall professionalism.
Falls Short of Expectations

Editing is inconsistent or unevenly applied throughout the entire paper. Grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors are so numerous as to seriously detract from the professionalism of the paper.
Appendices
5 %

Exemplary

All appendices are displayed, are appropriately labeled, and are in the same document (not in a separate file).
Meets Expectations

All appendices are displayed as part of the presentation.
Approaching Expectations

Most appendices are displayed, but may be mislabeled, or some documents are not included in the file, but are provided in a separate file.
Falls Short of Expectations

Appendices are missing, unlabeled, or not displayed as required.
Presentation Elements
The following elements of good presentation design will be considered as well.
Presentation Design
10 %

Exemplary

The design is very appealing, easy to read, without errors, and demonstrates an exemplary level of creativity.
Meets Expectations

The design is appealing, easy to read and contains no errors.
Approaching Expectations

The design is basic, with some errors.
Falls Short of Expectations

The design is not appealing, is difficult to read, and has numerous errors.
Presentation Organization
10 %

Exemplary

The presentation showed an exemplary level of organization and logical sequence. Extensive additional information is provided.
Meets Expectations

The presentation was organized and had a logical flow. Additional information was provided.
Approaching Expectations

The presentation shows some organization but fails to flow logically. Provides some additional information.
Falls Short of Expectations

The presentation shows poor organization and fails to flow logically. Provides little additional information.
Voice Recording
10 %

Exemplary

A clear, high-quality voice recording accompanies the presentation.
Meets Expectations
Approaching Expectations
Falls Short of Expectations
Timing
5 %

Exemplary

The presentation does not exceed 10 minutes in length.
Meets Expectations
Approaching Expectations
Falls Short of Expectations



Keywords:
  • Grad, ESL, ELL, ENL, Case Study, L541

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n202