Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: H464 Advocacy Paper: Crisis Management rubric

iRubric: H464 Advocacy Paper: Crisis Management rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
H464 Advocacy Paper: Crisis Management 
H464 Advocacy Paper: Crisis Management
Coordinated School Health Programs
Rubric Code: L5B9B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Introduction
  No Way

0 pts

Part Way

2 pts

On the Way

6 pts

All the Way

8 pts

Define the issue

3 points
No Way

The paper does not idenitfy possible crisis events that can occur in schools.
Part Way

The paper vaguely mentions the possible crisis events that can occur in schools.
On the Way

The paper identifies possible crisis events that can occur in schools but is lacking clarity or sufficient detail.
All the Way

The paper clearly identifies possible crisis events that can occur in schools.
Define the issue

5 points
No Way

The paper does not describe an effective crisis management plan or include essential actions during and after a crisis.
Part Way

The paper describes parts of a crisis management plan but does not include essential actions during and after a crisis.
On the Way

The paper describes an effective crisis management plan
OR includes essential actions during and after a crisis.
All the Way

The paper describes an effective crisis management plan
and includes essential actions during and after a crisis.
Discussion
  No Way

0 pts

Part Way

6 pts

On the Way

11 pts

All the Way

14 pts

Discussion

9 points
No Way

The paper does not identify or discuss the role of teacher during and after a crisis

The paper cdoes not specify how to assist students during a crisis.
Part Way

The paper vaguely identifies and discusses the role of teacher during and after a crisis

The paper does not clearly specifiy how to assist students during a crisis.
On the Way

The paper identifies and discusses the role of teacher during and after a crisis but is lacking clarity or sufficient detail.

The paper specifies how to assist students during a crisis.
All the Way

The paper identifies and discusses the role of teacher during and after a crisis

The paper clearly specifies how to assist students during a crisis.
Discussion

5 points
No Way

The paper does NOT define a crisis management team, explain its role, or how teachers can work with team.
Part Way

The paper partially answers the questions but does not define a crisis management team, explain its role, OR how teachers can work with team.
On the Way

The paper defines a crisis management team, OR explains its role, OR how teachers can work with team.

The paper may be lacking cohesion or sufficient detail.
All the Way

The paper clearly defines a crisis management team, explains its role, and how teachers can work with team.
Conclusion
  No Way

0 pts

Part Way

1 pts

On the Way

2 pts

All the Way

3 pts

Conclusion

3 points
No Way

The paper does NOT reflect on what the student learned regarding crisis management OR how you can help the school where you will work prepare for and manage a crisis.
Part Way

The paper partially reflects on what the student learned regarding crisis management OR how you can help the school where you will work prepare for and manage a crisis.
On the Way

The paper clearly reflects on what the student learned regarding crisis management OR how you can help the school where you will work prepare for and manage a crisis.
All the Way

The paper clearly reflects on what the student learned regarding crisis management AND how you can help the school where you will work prepare for and manage a crisis.
Technical Writing Guidelines
  No Way

(N/A)

Part Way

(N/A)

On the Way

(N/A)

All the Way

(N/A)

Technical Writing Guidelines

Points that can be subtracted for failing to meet guidelines (Up to 5 points)
No Way

The paper does not follow technical guidelines.
Part Way

The paper meets half of the technical guidelines (2/4).
On the Way

The paper meets the majority of the technical guidelines (3/4).
All the Way

The paper meets all 4 of the technical guidelines:
-Papers will be typed, 1.5 spaced, 12 point New Times Roman font, with 1” margins.
-Include all headings
-Include cover page with name, class title, assignment title, and due date.
-Correct spelling and grammar.
Technical Writing Guidelines

Points that can be subtracted for failing to meet guidelines (Up to 5 points)
No Way

The paper does not follow technical guidelines.
Part Way

The paper meets half of the technical guidelines (2/4).
On the Way

The paper meets the majority of the technical guidelines (3/4).
All the Way

The paper meets all 4 of the technical guidelines:
-Paper text will be 2 pages in length.
-Papers must include at least two sources properly cited in AMA style in the text.
-References on a separate page using AMA style.
-Rubric completed and attached
Total points possible
25



Keywords:
  • Crisis Management, Teacher, Schools, CSHP

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n232