Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: One Size Does Not Fit All Rubric

iRubric: One Size Does Not Fit All Rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
One Size Does Not Fit All Rubric 
Issue Paper Rubric
Rubric for paper assigned in relation to the One Size Does Not Fit All book. Student selects and applies a model of student affairs that best aligns with her/his undergraduate institution.
Rubric Code: L52WX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric C565 One Size
  Exemplary

10 pts

Meritorious

9 pts

Satisfactory

8 pts

Marginal

7 pts

Failing

6 pts

Introduction
20 %

organizational statement needed
Exemplary

-Topic of the paper in relation to the One Size Does Not Fit All text is clearly introduced
-Writer clearly introduces the dominant student affairs model at undergraduate institution
-Proper citations are used to frame the roadmap for the paper
-An organizational statement/thesis is included.
Meritorious

-Topic of the paper in relation to the One Size Does Not Fit All text is stated.
-Writer introduces the dominant model at undergraduate institution
-Organizational statement/thesis is included
-The focus of the introduction could be clearer.
Satisfactory

-The topic is introduced but is too broad to clearly connect to the One Size Does Not Fit All Text
-Some citations exist to support the topic
-The writer does not introduce the dominant model of student affairs practice at undergraduate institution
Marginal

-The topic is introduced but does not connect to One Size Does Not Fit All
-The focus of the paper is unclear
-no dominant model of student affairs practice at undergraduate institution is stated
-Lack of citations to support the issue
Failing

-Introduction does not identify the topic related to One Size Does Not FIt All
-No citations are provided to support the issue
-Lack of organizational statement/thesis
Clarity of Writing
10 %

Exemplary

-Few or no grammatical errors, spelling, and/or punctuation
-The writing does not ramble
-The writer provides examples and quotes that answers the reader's questions and add depth to the writer's ideas being presented
-Paper is carefully written and edited
Meritorious

-Some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation
-Paper shows some signs of editing, but needs more
-Thoughts are concise but could be connected together better.
Satisfactory

-The point trying to be conveyed is not clear to the reader
-Paragraph or sentence structure is repetitive
-Quotations are used appropriately, but create awkward sentences
Marginal

-The paper lacks flow and is difficult to follow
-Writing rambles indicating the paper has not been carefully edited
Failing

It is difficult to understand what the writer is trying to express.
Content
30 %

Exemplary

-The writer makes compelling connections between observed student affairs practice at undergraduate institution and the selected model
-examples clearly support the characteristics of the selected model from the book
-The writer balances their own voice with the evidence from the book
-Main ideas stand out, along with details
-The paper flows from one paragraph to the next in an organized paper
Meritorious

-The writer makes connections between observed student affairs practice at undergraduate institution and the model selected but more information is needed to support characteristics of the particular model
-writer needs to improve using one's own voice with evidence from the book
-The flow of the paper could be improved, transitions between paragraphs are missing
Satisfactory

-The writer makes minimal connections between observed student affairs practice at undergraduate institution and the model selected
-The flow of the paper is difficult to follow because of many missing transitions between paragraphs
-writer uses one's own voice without evidence from the book to support assertions
Marginal

-The author lacks to make any connections between observed student affairs practice at undergraduate institution and the model selected
-The writer runs on excessively
Failing

The paper does not provide any evidence the writer has made meaning of the student affairs models presented in One Size Does Not Fit All
Conclusions
30 %

Exemplary

-The writer makes clear conclusions about the type of student affairs model s/he wishes to work in after graduation
-The evidence provided in the body of the paper supports the conclusions about the preferred model made by the writer
-Citations are used to support the claims
Meritorious

-The writer provides concluding remarks
-A preferred model is stated, but writer needs to improve substantiating why a particular student affairs model is preferred
-Aspects of the conclusion are not supported with citations
Satisfactory

-A conclusion is provided related to the information shared in the content
-Author fails to clearly explain the preferred model and does not substantiate why a particular model is preferred
-The conclusion lacks the citations to make the connections
Marginal

-Conclusions are grounded in information that is not connected to One Size Does Not Fit All
-Writer selects a model that is not offered in the text
Failing

The paper does not include a conclusion based on the evidence presented in the One Size Does Not Fit All book.
Use of APA/Sources
10 %

Exemplary

-All necessary citations are provided in the body of the text and the reference section
-Accurately adheres to APA style in formatting, organization, and construction
Meritorious

-Minor errors in the formatting of the citations
-Writer often makes errors in organization and construction
Satisfactory

-Major errors in the formatting of the citations
-More attention needs to be paid to formatting APA citations and references
Marginal

-Citations are not done properly and require major editing
-Paper lacks the appropriate citations
Failing

The paper does not follow APA guidelines for in text citations or references




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n98