Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Self-Reflection Paper rubric

iRubric: Self-Reflection Paper rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Self-Reflection Paper 
Account of Your Own Story
The rubric for assignment covers two Parts: Part I is the student's account of dimensions of diversity from the "Four Layers of Diversity" reflection and Part II is the student's depiction of the Diversity Development Framework.
Rubric Code: H535B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric U546 Self-Reflection
  Exemplary

5 pts

Meritorious

4 pts

Satisfactory

3 pts

Marginal

2 pts

Failing

1 pts

Introduction/Conclusion
20 %

Exemplary

-Topic of the paper is clearly introduced and connection is drawn to dimensions of diversity
-An organizational statement/thesis is included
-exemplary roadmap for the paper is created
-Conclusion ties the paper together in a compelling way by connecting parts I and II
Meritorious

-The general topic to be discussed is introduced and a connection is made to dimensions of diversity
-Organizational statement/thesis is included, but focus of the introduction could be clearer.
-The conclusion could be clearer in connections between Part I and Part II
Satisfactory

-The topic is introduced but is too broad to determine what specifically will be discussed in the paper.
-The issue to be discussed has not been fully developed because it isn't well connected to dimensions of diversity
-conclusion does not connect ideas from Part I and Part II
Marginal

-A general topic is introduced, however the introduction fails to connect the ideas to dimensions of diversity
-The focus of the paper is unclear
-paper ends with an abrupt conclusion that doesn't tie the paper together
Failing

-Introduction does not clearly identify the topic that is being discussed
-Lack of organizational statement/thesis
-Lack of conclusion
Clarity of Writing
15 %

Exemplary

-Few or no grammatical errors, spelling, and/or punctuation
-The writing does not ramble
-The writer provides examples and quotes that answers the reader's questions and add depth to the writer's ideas being presented
-Paper is carefully written and edited
Meritorious

-Some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation
-Paper shows some signs of editing, but needs more
-Thoughts are concise but could be connected together better.
Satisfactory

-The point trying to be conveyed is not clear to the reader
-Paragraph or sentence structure is repetitive
-Quotations are used appropriately, but create awkward sentences
Marginal

-The paper lacks flow and is difficult to follow
-Writing rambles indicating the paper has not been carefully edited
Failing

It is difficult to understand what the writer is trying to express.
Content Part I
30 %

Exemplary

-The author thoroughly offers four dimensions of diversity and compelling description of each
-Main ideas stand out, along with details. Ideas in the paper are compelling about how cultural norms were developed
-incidents described are connected to dimensions of diversity
-The paper flows from one paragraph to the next in an organized paper
Meritorious

-The author offers four dimensions of diversity and description of each
-The author needs a bit more evidence to support the points being made by the writer
-cultural norms are explained, but could be more clearly connected to dimensions of diversity
-Ideas are mostly clear but more information is needed
-The flow of the paper could be improved, transitions between paragraphs are missing
Satisfactory

-The author states four dimensions, but poorly describes each
-evidence to support points being made is missing
-cultural norms are named but not connected to dimensions of diversity
-paper does not flow well from one point to the next
Marginal

-The author states four dimensions, but does not describe each one
-The writer has omitted sections of the content or content runs on excessively
-the author does not describe how cultural norms were developed
Failing

-the author fails to discuss four dimensions of diversity
-author does not describe how cultural norms were developed
-the paper does not flow from one paragraph to the next
Content Part II
30 %

Exemplary

-author includes 8 to 10 significant categories of otherness
-author uses a creative format to present the framework
-thorough descriptions of each category are offered with evidence to support how the author came to conclude unawareness, dualistic awareness, etc.
Meritorious

-author includes 8 to 10 significant categories of otherness
-descriptions of each category are offered with some evidence to support how the author came to conclude unawareness, dualistic awareness, etc.
Satisfactory

-author includes 8 significant categories of otherness
-descriptions of each category are offered, but author does not provide support for how his/her conclusions about unawareness, dualistic awareness, etc. were formed
Marginal

-author does not include significant categories of otherness
-picture is created, but not described
-author fails to provide evidence about how he/she falls into unawareness, dualistic, etc. for each dimension
Failing

-author does not provide pictoral description of a framework
-author does not include significant categories of otherness
Use of APA/Sources
5 %

Exemplary

-All necessary citations are provided in the body of the text and the reference section
-Accurately adheres to APA style in formatting, organization, and construction
-Consistent use of APA style throughout the paper
Meritorious

-Minor errors in the formatting of the citations
-Good application of APA style
Satisfactory

-More attention needs to be paid to formatting APA citations and references
-Writer rarely complies with APA
Marginal

-Citations are not done properly and require major editing
Failing

The paer does not follow APA guidelines for in text citations or references




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n98