Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Positionality Paper rubric

iRubric: Positionality Paper rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Positionality Paper 
Self-Reflection Paper
Rubric Code: G537A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric U546 Self-Reflection
  Exemplary

5 pts

Meritorious

4 pts

Satisfactory

3 pts

Marginal

2 pts

Failing

1 pts

Introduction/Conclusion
20 %

Exemplary

-Topic of the paper is clearly introduced and connection is drawn to researcher positionality
-An organizational statement/thesis is included
-exemplary roadmap for the paper is created
-Conclusion ties the paper together in a compelling way by connecting points addressed in the paper
Meritorious

-The general topic to be discussed is introduced and a connection is made to researcher positionalities
-Organizational statement/thesis is included, but focus of the introduction could be clearer.
-The conclusion could be clearer in connecting aspects of the paper
Satisfactory

-The topic is introduced but is too broad to determine what specifically will be discussed in the paper.
-The issue to be discussed has not been fully developed because it isn't well connected to researcher positionalities
-conclusion does not connect ideas presented in the paper
Marginal

-A general topic is introduced, however the introduction fails to connect the ideas to researcher positionalities
-The focus of the paper is unclear
-paper ends with an abrupt conclusion that doesn't tie the paper together
Failing

-Introduction does not clearly identify the topic that is being discussed
-Lack of organizational statement/thesis
-Lack of conclusion
Clarity of Writing
15 %

Exemplary

-Few or no grammatical errors, spelling, and/or punctuation
-The writing does not ramble
-The writer provides examples and background experiences that answers the reader's questions and add depth to the writer's ideas being presented
-Paper is carefully written and edited
Meritorious

-Some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation
-Paper shows some signs of editing, but needs more
-Thoughts are concise but could be connected together better.
Satisfactory

-The point trying to be conveyed is not clear to the reader
-Paragraph or sentence structure is repetitive
-Quotations are used appropriately, but create awkward sentences
Marginal

-The paper lacks flow and is difficult to follow
-Writing rambles indicating the paper has not been carefully edited
Failing

It is difficult to understand what the writer is trying to express.
Content Part I
30 %

Exemplary

-The author thoroughly offers evidence to support how the exercise on 115 of JTA was constructed
-compelling description of salient identities and challenges are offered because main ideas stand out, along with details.
-assumptions about knowledge creation connect with ways identities are described
-The paper flows from one paragraph to the next in an organized paper
Meritorious

-The author offers some evidence about how the exercise on 115 of JTA was constructed
-The author needs a bit more evidence to support the points being made by the writer
-some assumptions about knowledge creation connect with ways identities are described
-Ideas are mostly clear but more information is needed
-The flow of the paper could be improved, transitions between paragraphs are missing
Satisfactory

-The author barely offers evidence to support how the exercise on 115 of JTA was constructed
-The author needs a bit more evidence to support the points being made by the writer
-few assumptions about knowledge creation connect with ways identities are described
-paper does not flow well from one point to the next
Marginal

-The author does not connect the exercise on 115 to the information presented in the paper
-The writer has omitted sections of the content or content runs on excessively
-the author does not describe how knowledge assumptions were derived
Failing

-the author fails to complete the exercise on page 115 of JTA
-the paper does not flow from one paragraph to the next
Content Part II
30 %

Exemplary

-author includes evidence to support interest in organizational change and diversity
-complexities about how identities shape the research project are addressed in a compelling way (clear choices of salience are described)
-author connects investigation of social identities with the interview process
Meritorious

-author includes some information about what brought him or her to investigating organizational change and diversity
-complexities about how identities shape the research project are included (aspects of salience are described quite well)
-author mostly connects the investigation of social identities with interview process
Satisfactory

-author includes little information about what brought him or her to investigating organizational change and diversity
-complexities about how identities shape the research project are somewhat included
-author occasionally connects the investigation of social identities with interview process, but lacked depth
Marginal

-author includes little information about what brought him or her to investigating organizational change and diversity
-complexities about how identities shape the research project are barely included
-author poorly connects the investigation of social identities with interview process
Failing

-author does not provide any evidence about why she or he is interested in organizational change and diversity
-author does not draw any connections between the intersections of social identities and how he or she may interpret the interview process
Use of APA/Sources
5 %

Exemplary

-All necessary citations are provided in the body of the text and the reference section
-Accurately adheres to APA style in formatting, organization, and construction (e.g. running head, title page, headers)
-Consistent use of APA style throughout the paper
Meritorious

-Minor errors in the formatting of the citations
-Minor errors in the formatting of the paper (e.g. running head, title page, headers)
-Good application of APA style
Satisfactory

-More attention needs to be paid to formatting APA citations, references, and paper style (e.g. running head, title page, headers)
-Writer rarely complies with APA
Marginal

-Citations are not done properly and require major editing
-formatting does not comply with APA style
Failing

The paper does not follow APA guidelines for in text citations, references, or formatting.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16