iRubric: x470/L502 Article Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
x470/L502 Article Review x470/L502 Article Review Prof. Serafin Coronel- Molina Socio-/Psycholinguistic Applications to Reading Rubric Code: B5AA9 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Article Review Rubric Descriptions Enter rubric description
	Poor 60 pts	Fair 80 pts	Good 95 pts	Excellent 100 pts
Introduction 15 pts Enter description	Poor No introduction and misleading and inaccurate background information.	Fair The introduction is not clear enough and some background information is missing.	Good The introduction is clear and concise. The background information is included effectively.	Excellent The introduction is very clear and concise. The background information included is solid.
Summary 25 pts Enter description	Poor The purpose is not evident. The description of the methodology and findings are not acceptable.	Fair The purpose is not stated clearly enough. The description of the methodology and findings lack certain pertinent aspects.	Good The purpose is clearly stated. The description of the methodology and findings are clearly described.	Excellent The purpose is very clear. The description of the methodology and findings are outstandingly described.
Evaluation/ Critique 25 pts Enter description	Poor Evaluation/critique is missing. No student’s point of view is included.	Fair Some evaluation/critique is provided. Student’s point of view about the article is not evident enough.	Good Solid evaluation/critique is provided. Student’s point of view about the article is evident and well- explained.	Excellent Very solid evaluation/critique is provided. Student’s point of view about the article is evident and very well- explained.
Connections to readings/discussions 15 pts	Poor No connections to the readings and class discussions are made.	Fair Connections to the readings and class discussions are made to a certain degree.	Good Connections to the readings and class discussions are effectively made.	Excellent Connections to the readings and class discussions are extraordinary.
Classroom Applications/Conclusion 15 pts	Poor No classroom applications are mentioned. The conclusion is missing.	Fair Connections to classroom applications are made but are not clear enough. The conclusion is not precisely formulated.	Good Connections to classroom applications are successfully made. The conclusion is skillfully written.	Excellent Connections to classroom applications are very successfully made. The conclusion is outstanding.
Formatting 5 pts	Poor No consideration of the APA format and the guidelines for the assignment.	Fair Some APA formatting is missing and the student does not follow the guidelines for the assignment appropriately.	Good Strictly follows the APA format and guidelines of the assignment.	Excellent Very strictly follows the APA format and guidelines of the assignment.