Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: FA2013 P312 OP-ED rubric

iRubric: FA2013 P312 OP-ED rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
FA2013 P312 OP-ED rubric 
Rubric for Ed Psych course
Rubric Code: B55B9
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Proposal
  Insufficient

0 pts

Competent

5 pts

Exemplary

10 pts

Timely submission of project propos

Insufficient

No proposal is submitted. Note that if an inappropriate article is chosen, you may not receive credit for the paper without a required re-submission
Competent

Submission is late.
Exemplary

On time submission.
Summary
  Insufficient

0-11

11 pts

Competent

12-16

16 pts

Exemplary

17-20

20 pts

Summary

Accurate, thorough (but brief) summary of the original argument.
Insufficient

The source is unclear.

The author’s argument is poorly and incorrectly articulated or is not represented at all.
Competent

The summary lists the name of the piece, and the author. The publication source is unclear.

The author’s argument is not articulated, or is incorrectly articulated. Alternatively it may be articulated in an unclear or long-winded manner
Exemplary

The summary lists the name of the piece, the author, and the publication source.

The author’s argument is briefly and clearly summarized and reflects the argument in the piece.
Position statement
  Insufficient

(0-11)

11 pts

Competent

(12-19)

19 pts

Exemplary

(20-25)

25 pts

Position statement

Clear statement of your position on the issue.
Insufficient

You do not have a clear claim and / or your claims appear to largely be opinion with no support.
Competent

It is not clear what your thesis is, or you have a clear thesis but are less clear in what the ideas are that support your claims.
Exemplary

Your position makes a clear claim including a thesis statement that identifies both the issue and your position relative to it.

You also offer reasons (warrants) that support your claim and they are well organized and clearly related to the initial thesis.
Application of theory
  Insufficient

(0-29)

29 pts

Competent

(30-35)

35 pts

Exemplary

(36-40)

40 pts

Application of theory

Support of your position using class resources.
Insufficient

You only address one theory, and / or for the theories you do not clearly do one of the following:
1) Explain in detail the core ideas of the theory that are relevant to this topic.
2) You define the terms in a way that will make sense to a general audience.
3) You clearly articulate how the theoretical ideas are related to the specific topic.
Competent

You include two theories. For each theory you:

1) Explain in detail the core ideas of the theory that are relevant to this topic.
2) You define the terms in a way that will make sense to a general audience.
3) You clearly articulate how the theoretical ideas are related to the specific topic.
Exemplary

You include two theories. For each theory you:

1) Explain in detail the core ideas of the theory that are relevant to this topic.
2) You define the terms in a way that will make sense to a general audience.
3) You provide citations to indicate where your ideas come from.
4) You clearly articulate how the theoretical ideas are related to the specific topic.
5) You contrast the theoretical ideas to the other theory.
Writing conventions
  Insufficient

(0-1)

1 pts

Competent

(2-3)

3 pts

Exemplary

(4-5)

5 pts

Writing conventions

Clear and careful writing, in appropriate style
Insufficient

It is rather difficult to read your paper and follow your argument. I am unclear what your thesis is, and cannot see how each section links to the thesis or the other sections around it.
Competent

Your assignment is not clear for a general audience or has a number of spelling and grammar errors. Alternatively it may be difficult to follow the logic of your argument.
Exemplary

This assignment should be directed at a general audience with a basic understanding of educational issues. Your paper is coherent, well-organized and has few if any major spelling / grammar errors.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n98