iRubric: Spring 2013 - W200 - Eportfolio rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Spring 2013 - W200 - Eportfolio Spring 2013 - W200 - Eportfolio Rubric Code: L58AX Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: ePortfolio Grade Levels: Undergraduate

General Information-Home Descriptions Worth total 5 points
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable. 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional. 5 pts
Home Page	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good	Great	Excellent Seamlessly described pages, consider adding internal links to them. Their content is consistent, clear, and contains all the following: Home page that : • Welcomes visitors • Briefly explains the pages [About Me, Gallery, Case Projects, NETS-T Standards, Professional Development] of your site • Visually appealing - has appropriate decorative elements • Added touch: Internal links to website pages
General Information-About Me Worth total 5 Points
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
About Me page	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good	Great	Excellent All requirements completed perfectly: • Professional picture of you or equivalent [Points deducted for cropped images and inappropriate images ] • Introduction of yourself as a pre-service teacher(name, education, your subject area and grade level to teach) • Why do you want to be a teacher? • What are your pedagogical beliefs as a teacher? • Include your perspective about using technology in education • Embed your YouTube digital story video with a title and description
General Information-Gallery Worth total 15 points
	Missing No Submission. 0 pts	Poor 3 pts	Fair Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable. 6 pts	Good 9 pts	Great 12 pts	Excellent All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional. 15 pts
Gallery Page	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good	Great	Excellent Required: • Five best work examples • Everything is public and published • For each example, have complete - Title (linked) - Screen shot - Description - Educational Value
General Information-Case Projects Worth a total 10 points
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable. 4 pts	Acceptable 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional. 10 pts
Case projects	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Acceptable	Good	Excellent Required: • Composed of Case Projects as upper-level page, and Case #1 and Case #2 as separate sub-pages • Each sub-page has Case Analysis Google Doc embed with the two Artifacts • Title and Descriptions for each Case Analysis and Artifacts are provided • Google Docs embeds are reasonably sized (*Recommended: 600x300) • Each page is well organized for viewers
General Information-NETS-T Standard Worth a total of 30 points; 5 points each Standard presented
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
NETS-T	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable.	Good	Great	Excellent All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional. TIP#15: Digital divide presentation
NETS-T 1	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair Has • Provided two examples of evidence for Standard 1 • Described each example in at least two to three sentences and explicitly connected the examples to the standard	Good	Great	Excellent Has creatively, explicitly and seamlessly • Provided three or more examples of evidence for Standard 1 • Has described each example in at least three or more sentences and explicitly connected the examples to the standard
NETS-T 2	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair Has • Provided two examples of evidence for Standard 2 • Described each example in at least two to three sentences and explicitly connected the examples to the standard	Good	Great	Excellent Has creatively, explicitly and seamlessly • Provided three or more examples of evidence for Standard 2 • Has described each example in at least three or more sentences and explicitly connected the examples to the standard
NETS-T 3	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair Has • Provided two examples of evidence for Standard 3 • Described each example in at least two to three sentences and explicitly connected the examples to the standard	Good	Great	Excellent Has creatively, explicitly and seamlessly • Provided three or more examples of evidence for Standard 3 • Has described each example in at least three or more sentences and explicitly connected the examples to the standard
NETS-T 4	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair Has • Provided at least two to three examples of evidence for Standard 4 • Described each example in at least two to three sentences and explicitly connect your example to the standard	Good	Great	Excellent Has creatively, explicitly and seamlessly • Provided three or more examples of evidence for Standard 4 • Has described each example in at least three or more sentences and explicitly connected the examples to the standard
NETS-T 5	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair Has • Provided at least two to three examples of evidence for Standard 5 • Described each example in at least two to three sentences and explicitly connect your example to the standard	Good	Great	Excellent Has creatively, explicitly and seamlessly • Provided three or more examples of evidence for Standard 5 • Has described each example in at least three or more sentences and explicitly connected the examples to the standard
Professional Development Worth a total of 20 points, 5 points for each task
	BLANK 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable. 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional. 5 pts
Presenting Profiler Pro	BLANK No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good	Great	Excellent Required: • Your Profiler Pro pre- and post- survey result images
Analyzing Profiler Pro data	BLANK No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good	Great	Excellent Required: • Strengths and areas of improvements are presented • Strengths and areas of weaknesses are based on the survey data • Specific reference to the survey categories/items are included.
Profiler Pro Goals & Evidences	BLANK No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good	Great	Excellent Required: • The PD goals have met the SMART criteria • Personal statement on whether the goals have been met is presented • Evidences are well described and presented.
TIP#12	BLANK No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good	Great	Excellent TIP#12: Creating online Management System
Professionalism & Creativity Worth total 15 points
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Formatting, copyright	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good Page formatting has elements of inconsistencies, but the overall format is acceptable.	Great	Excellent Page formatting on all pages is flawless, consistent, and exceptionally completed: • Spacing between blocks of text, are either too big/small • Headings/ subheadings to guide reader • Bullets/Number list options are indented • Consistent use of font face, size, and color are consistent and readable for the following: •Titles •Subheadings •Body text and links •Copyright: navigation box with creative commons logo
Writing Mechanics	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good • Some spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization errors have been spotted. • Proper pronouns are not always used. • Writing is sometimes informal/not professional.	Great	Excellent • No spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization errors are found. *Recommended: Run the text through MS Word, just to be safe • Appropriate use of proper nouns (e.g., Internet, Google, SMART Board, PowerPoint, etc.) • Has strong evidence of formal/professional writing (avoids contractions, abbreviations, “I feel/think”)
Creativity	Missing No Submission.	Poor	Fair	Good The ePortfolio is acceptably professional and showing some evidence of one's potential as a teacher.	Great	Excellent The ePortfolio is exceptionally professional and showing strong evidence of one's potential as a teacher.

Keywords:

W200 Spring 2013

Subjects:

Education

Types:

ePortfolio

Discuss this rubric