Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: L239/L539 Case Study Paper rubric

iRubric: L239/L539 Case Study Paper rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
L239/L539 Case Study Paper 
L541 Case Study Paper
The purpose of this assignment sequence is to give you experience with developing a case study of a second language writer. For this assignment, you will synthesize the work you have done with your learner throughout this course.
Rubric Code: X5BAA
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Locked Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Content
  Falls Short of Expectations

7 pts

Approaching Expectations

8 pts

Meets Expectations

9 pts

Exemplary

10 pts

Language as a system
10 %

[Performance indicator 1.a]
Falls Short of Expectations

Information from your reflections and observations appears disjointed or is a "cobbling together" of previous assignments. Does not adequately represent your understanding of how language works as a system. Does not present an integrated case study.
Approaching Expectations

Information from your reflections and observations is included to show your understanding of language as a system, but is not presented as a unified whole. Needs more work to integrate information.
Meets Expectations

Information from your reflections and observations mostly works together to provide an integrated synthesis of your understanding of language as a system. May need more integration.
Exemplary

Information from your reflections and observations is well-chosen and demonstrates your understanding of how language as a system; all elements work together to provide an integrated synthesis that offers readers a case study of your focus learner.
Language acquisition & development
10 %

[Performance indicator 1.b]
Falls Short of Expectations

Information from your reflections and observations appears disjointed or is a "cobbling together" of previous assignments. Does not adequately represent your understanding of how how language acquisition occurs. Does not present an integrated case study.
Approaching Expectations

Information from your reflections and observations is included to show your understanding of how language acquisition occurs, but is not presented as a unified whole. Needs more work to integrate information.
Meets Expectations

Information from your reflections and observations mostly works together to provide an integrated synthesis of your understanding of how language acquisition occurs. May need more integration.
Exemplary

Information from your reflections and observations is well-chosen and demonstrates your understanding of how language acquisition occurs; all elements work together to provide an integrated synthesis that offers readers a case study of your focus learner.
Culture and student learning
10 %

[Performance indicator 2]
Falls Short of Expectations

Information from your reflections and observations appears disjointed or is a "cobbling together" of previous assignments. Does not adequately represent your understanding of how culture plays a role in language development. Does not present an integrated case study.
Approaching Expectations

Information from your reflections and observations is included to show your understanding of how culture plays a role in language development, but is not presented as a unified whole. Needs more work to integrate information.
Meets Expectations

Information from your reflections and observations mostly works together to provide an integrated synthesis of your understanding of how culture plays a role in language development. May need more integration.
Exemplary

Information from your reflections and observations is well-chosen and demonstrates your understanding of how culture plays a role in language development; all elements work together to provide an integrated synthesis that offers readers a case study of your focus learner.
Planning for Instruction
20 %

[Performance indicator 3.a]
Falls Short of Expectations

A summary of the learner's characteristics is not included or is perfunctory; summary is given but not as evidence for tutoring decisions. Data from tutoring sessions is perfunctory or not included; information appears disjointed or is not incorporated throughout the report.
Approaching Expectations

A summary of the learner's characteristics is included but needs elaboration; summary serves as evidence for some tutoring decisions. Data from tutoring sessions is included, but appears somewhat disjointed or is not incorporated throughout the report.
Meets Expectations

A summary of the learner's characteristics is included as evidence for most tutoring decisions. Data from tutoring sessions is included, but needs to be more fully incorporated throughout the report.
Exemplary

A thorough summary of the learner's characteristics is included and serves as evidence for all tutoring decisions. Data collected from tutoring sessions is integrated throughout and supports analysis of your learner's needs, your efforts to address these needs through lesson planning and tutoring.
Implementing & Managing Instruction
20 %

[Performance indicator 3.b]
Falls Short of Expectations

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are described inadequately or in too much detail. This information is not well-balanced within the assignment as a whole. Recommendations for future instruction are perfunctory or absent; link between recommendations and the learner is unclear or unsupported by course readings and relevant literature.
Approaching Expectations

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are described with some detail; more attention to the balance between description and the rest of the paper is needed. Recommendations for future instruction are included but need more detail; link between recommendations and the learner is somewhat clear or needs more support from course readings and relevant literature.
Meets Expectations

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are described in detail but needs more editing to balance the amount of description with the rest of the paper. Recommendations for future instruction are included; link between recommendations and the learner is mostly clear and supported by course readings and relevant literature.
Exemplary

The lesson plan and the tutoring experience are integrated and described with rich detail; this element is well-balanced with the rest of the paper. Recommendations for future instruction are described in detail, clearly linked to the learner's characteristics and supported through references to course readings and research literature.
Professionalism
10 %

Falls Short of Expectations

The tone of the report lacks formality; or attempts at applying a critical perspective to the information are perfunctory; lacks application of a critical perspective throughout most of the work.
Approaching Expectations

The tone of the report is formal; attempts at applying a critical perspective to the examples, explanations and research data are somewhat successful and mostly applied throughout.
Meets Expectations

The tone of the report is formal; attempts at applying a critical perspective to the examples, explanations and research data were largely successful and applied throughout.
Exemplary

The tone of the report is formal and applies a critical perspective to the examples, explanations and research data consistent with practitioners in the field.
Formatting/Editing
Formatting/Following Guidelines
10 %

Falls Short of Expectations

APA style guidelines have not been followed or are inconsistently applied. Guidelines for assignments as described in the syllabus are inconsistently or inaccurately applied.
Approaching Expectations

An evident attempt was made to follow APA style guidelines but the paper contains several errors or guidelines are inconsistently applied.
Meets Expectations

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments as provided in syllabus. APA formatting is mostly correct and and applied throughout, including title page and references.
Exemplary

Formatting follows guidelines for assignments as provided in syllabus. APA formatting is accurate and and consistently applied throughout, including title page and references.
Editing
5 %

Falls Short of Expectations

Editing is inconsistent or unevenly applied throughout the entire paper. Grammatical, punctuation, or spelling errors are so numerous as to seriously detract from the professionalism of the paper.
Approaching Expectations

Editing is mostly consistent but may be unevenly applied, or paper contains several errors which detract from the overall professionalism.
Meets Expectations

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; may contain a few errors but these do not detract much from the overall level of professionalism.
Exemplary

Editing is consistent and evident throughout; final product is polished and professional. Few to no errors.
Appendices
5 %

Falls Short of Expectations

Appendices are missing, unlabeled, or not attached to the final document as required.
Approaching Expectations

Most appendices are attached to the document, but may be mislabeled, or some documents are not included in the file, but are provided in a separate file.
Meets Expectations

All appendices are attached to the document and are in the same document (not in a separate file).
Exemplary

All appendices are attached to the document, appropriately labeled, and are in the same document (not in a separate file).



Keywords:
  • Grad, ESL, ELL, ENL, Case Study, L541

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16