Skip to main content

RCampus ePortfolios

iRubric: Intervention rubric

iRubric: Intervention rubric


edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Intervention 
Intervention
Rubric Code: R595B
By slhoEport
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Fails to Meet Criteria

1 pts

Meets Criteria

2 pts

Exceeds Criteria

3 pts

Target Behavior - Outcome Measures

Fails to Meet Criteria

Failed to describe in observable and measurable terms
Meets Criteria

Described target behavior in observable and measurable terms
Exceeds Criteria

Outcome goal is linked to target behavior that is described in observable and measurable terms
Intervention Rationale

Fails to Meet Criteria

Failed to provide a rationale for the intervention, or rationale for intervention was not logically linked with assessment data
Meets Criteria

Rationale for the intervention was strongly implied, but not explicitly stated, or intervention was not clearly linked to assessment data
Exceeds Criteria

Rationale for the intervention was explicitly stated in intervention report, and intervention was logically linked with assessment data
Intervention Strategy Description

Fails to Meet Criteria

Failed to describe intervention strategy
Meets Criteria

Provided brief or generic description of intervention strategy
Exceeds Criteria

Provided detailed description of intervention strategy
Responsive to Needs

Fails to Meet Criteria

Intervention developed without teacher involvement, and no evidence of regular check-ins with teacher during implementation
Meets Criteria

Intervention developed in collaboration with teacher and reflects teacher’s concerns, but check-ins may be irregular, and the intervention unchanged in response to teacher concerns
Exceeds Criteria

Intervention clearly reflects teachers concerns, and regular check-ins result in modification of the intervention to meet classroom needs
Evidence/Research Based

Fails to Meet Criteria

Did not utilize an evidence based intervention strategy, nor was a rationale provided for the use of novel strategies
Meets Criteria

Utilized strategy that was not evidence-based, and no strong rationale provided for the expected effectiveness of chosen strategies (supports use of strategy with scientifically credible research citations)
Exceeds Criteria

Provided citations to document the evidence based strategy, or a strong rationale was provided for use of non-EB strategies (e.g., no proven EB strategies are available for this population. Multiple scientifically credible research citations are presented in at least a paragraph)
Individual Differences / Diversity

Fails to Meet Criteria

Chose strategies without consideration of developmental, language, or cultural issues for the client or population
Meets Criteria

Provided strong rationale for use of strategies with client, however, no prior efficacy data (i.e., documented in the research literature) or analysis was presented to support its use with this client or population
Exceeds Criteria

Provided strong rationale for use of strategies with client, and prior efficacy data or analysis was considered to support their use with this client or population
Treatment Fidelity

Fails to Meet Criteria

Did not monitor treatment fidelity
Meets Criteria

Treatment fidelity was monitored, but measured via client (teacher or parent) report only
Exceeds Criteria

Intervention fidelity was measured via rating form, or direct observation
Social Validity

Fails to Meet Criteria

Did not measure social validity of intervention goals, intervention strategies, or intervention outcomes
Meets Criteria

Measured social validity only through oral teacher report
Exceeds Criteria

Used a written measure of social validity
Generalization and Maintenance

Fails to Meet Criteria

Did not plan for generalization across persons, settings, or time
Meets Criteria

Planned for generalization or maintenance, but did not plan for both generalization and maintenance
Exceeds Criteria

Planned for generalization and planned for maintenance of skills
Evaluation of Change
Graphical Display of Outcome Data

Fails to Meet Criteria

Failed to provide graphical display of outcome data to client
Meets Criteria

Provided graphical display of outcome data, but some aspects may be incomplete (e.g., inadequate labeling of axes, no clear delineation of phases)
Exceeds Criteria

Provided complete and clear graphical display of outcome data, including clear delineation of phases and event lines identifying important intervention changes or external events
Inter-observer Agreement

Fails to Meet Criteria

Did not measure inter-observer agreement
Meets Criteria

easured inter-observer agreement at least once during baseline or intervention
Exceeds Criteria

Measured inter-observer agreement multiple times through baseline and intervention
Experimental Control

Fails to Meet Criteria

Did not include baseline measure of performance
Meets Criteria

Used simple AB design
Exceeds Criteria

Included a maintenance or return to baseline phase after intervention phase or used multiple baseline across settings or participants
Baseline Data Points and Stability

Fails to Meet Criteria

Inadequate (2 or fewer) number of baseline data points; and/or poor stability
Meets Criteria

Adequate (3) number of baseline points to assess stability, but stability not achieved
Exceeds Criteria

Adequate (more than 3) number of points; Stable baseline responding established prior to beginning intervention
Appropriate Measure of Change

Fails to Meet Criteria

Did not include any measure of change or effect size measure to measure treatment effects
Meets Criteria

Documented treatment effects only with visual inspection or via a method that may not be appropriate (e.g. mean differences in the presence of unstable baseline; use of PND with continuous trend data)
Exceeds Criteria

Provided a specific measure of change and/or effect size as appropriate to the data (e.g., Change in level: PND, measure of immediacy of change; Change in Trend: Calculate slope, split middle line of progress
Interpretation

Fails to Meet Criteria

Data presented without interpretation or with inaccurate conclusions based on data
Meets Criteria

Interpretation captures major conclusions
Exceeds Criteria

Interpretation captures major conclusions and nuances of the data




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved
n16