iRubric for Oncourse

 

 help 

iRubric: W200 - Spring 2010 - E-portfolio Draft rubric

iRubric: W200 - Spring 2010 - E-portfolio Draft rubric

preview rubric

 

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

W200 - Spring 2010 - E-portfolio Draft built by

Rubric Code: Q48AX
Rubric for e-portfolio draft assignment
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: e-portfolio w200
Categories: Subjects: Education  
Types: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate


Powered by iRubric Home and About Me Pages
Criteria for the content and appearance of Home and About Me pages
  Poor
2 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Home Page
2 pts
Poor

Three of the qualities listed in the excellent column are missing.
Fair

Two of the qualities listed in the excellent column are missing.
Good

One of the qualities listed in the excellent column is missing.
Excellent

Invites the reader to view the portfolio (2). Has something of visual appeal to make the portfolio enticing (2). Explains to the reader what they can expect to find (3). Sounds genuine and individual, not like a cookie-cutter job (3).
About Me Page
2 pts
Poor

Three of the qualities listed in the excellent column are missing.
Fair

Two of the qualities listed in the excellent column are missing.
Good

One of the qualities listed in the excellent column is missing.
Excellent

Information on page is primarily professional (things someone hiring you would want to know) (2). A professional picture of you in included (2). Your attitudes/beliefs about technology in education can be found (3). Sounds genuine and individual, not like a cookie-cutter job (3).
Gallery
  Poor
2 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Explanations
1 pts
Poor

The explanations are missing or poorly written for most of the gallery items.
Fair

Explanations for some of the gallery items are vague. Does not describe both technology itself and its educational merits. Linkage between the items and the subject area is not well established.
Good

Explanations of gallery items thoroughly explain both the technology itself and its educational merits. Linkage between the items and the subject area is not well established.
Excellent

Explanations of gallery items thoroughly explain both the technology itself and its educational merits. Explanations are also well aligned with the subject area.
Quality and Quantity
1 pts
Poor

The gallery includes only few items; it does not reflect variety. Quality does not convey a high level of technological ability and achievement.
Fair

The page includes a fair number of technological projects. The quality and quantity of the projects in the gallery convey an average level of technological ability and achievement.
Good

The page as a whole is a good showcase. It "wow's" the viewer with the listed technological projects. The quality and the projects in the gallery convey a high level of technological ability and achievement. The page is only missing the variety (quantity).
Excellent

The page as a whole is a true gallery; a showcase. It "wow's" the viewer with a variety of technological projects. The quality and quantity of the projects in the gallery convey a high level of technological ability and achievement.
Functionality and Organization
Criteria for functionality and organization of the e-portfolio
  Poor
2 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Excellent
5 pts
Functionality
1 pts
Poor

Several links are broken or several objects are not publicly viewable.
Fair

There are two broken links or unpublished objects on the site.
Good

One of the links is broken or one object is not published (publicly viewable)
Excellent

All links work properly (-1 point per broken or misdirected link).
Embedded objects are public/published- someone who is not logged in as YOU can see them (-1 point for each unviewable object)
Professionalism
Writing and Grammar
1 pts
Poor

Poorly written. Language is not correctly used. There are minor grammatical or typing errors. It lack professional tone.
Fair

Language is correctly used. There are minor grammatical or typing errors. It lack professional tone.
Good

Language is correctly used and there are no grammatical or typing errors. It lacks professional tone.
Excellent

Writing has a professional tone and correct use of language throughout the portfolio.
Page organization
1 pts
Poor

Poor page organization. Pages are not clear and manageable for the viewer. Headings, different fonts, etc are not used to help the viewer.
Fair

Some of the pages are not clear or manageable for the viewer. Headings, different fonts, etc are used but not consistently.
Good

The organization of each page of the portfolio is clear and manageable for the viewer. Headings, different fonts, etc are used but not consistently.
Excellent

The organization of each page of the portfolio is clear and manageable for the viewer. Headings, different fonts, etc are used to add clarity.
Completeness and Coherence
1 pts
Poor

The portfolio does not look like a one-piece project. There are format differences between the pages. It looks like a last-minute work.
Fair

The portfolio does not look complete. There are missing parts/pages. Completed parts are promising but does not convey professionalism.
Good

The portfolio is only lacking a general professional polish. It appears to be a finished product that you are proud of and that conveys professionalism and care rather than rushed, haphazard, or last-minute work that simply meets minimum expectations.
Excellent

The portfolio exhibits a general professional polish. It appears to be a finished product that you are proud of and that conveys professionalism and care rather than rushed, haphazard, or last-minute work that simply meets minimum expectations.



Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus  

iRubric and RCampus are Trademarks of Reazon Systems, Inc.

Copyright (C) Reazon Systems Inc. All Rights Reserved

Powered by RCampus