iRubric: Spring 2015 - W200 - Case Analysis rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Spring 2015 - W200 - Case Analysis Fall 2014 - W200 - Case Analysis Rubric Code: N5A7C Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Step 1. Analyze the Case Descriptions
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Missing 0 pts
Teaching Context	Excellent Relevant contextual factors are listed and described in detail. This includes: learner characteristics, teacher beliefs, availability of technology, and levels of prior knowledge. Instructional concerns related to the context are discussed at length.	Good	Fair Relevant contextual factors are listed and described in detail. However, some aspects could be improved. Instructional concerns related to the context are discussed.	Poor Relevant contextual factors are listed, but some are missing. Instructional concerns are not discussed, or unrelated to contextual factors.	Incomplete	Missing No Submission
Summary of Problems	Excellent All problems are summarized in a concise manner. Problem descriptions exhibit thorough and deep understanding of the case. The inference is logical.	Good	Fair Problems are summarized. Problem descriptions show reasonable understanding of the case. However, some of the inferences are not logical.	Poor Problems are poorly described and the inference is not logical.	Incomplete	Missing No Submission
Learning Objectives	Excellent Learning objectives aligned with the standards . The objectives were described in a Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Timely way.	Good	Fair Learning objectives aligned with the standards. Some of the objectives were described in a Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Timely way.	Poor	Incomplete Learning objectives did not align with the standards. Most of the objectives were NOT described in a Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Timely way.	Missing No Submission
Step 1. Analyze the Case
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 5 pts	Poor 3 pts	Imcomplete 2 pts	Missing 0 pts
Lesson Plan Outline	Excellent The lesson plan outline is well-designed and comprehensive. The lesson demonstrate you are thinking outside the box. The instruction and the activities are meaningful and perfectly align with the students’ grade level and their interests.	Good The lesson plan outline is well-designed. Most of activities are meaningful and align with the students grade level and their interests.	Fair The lesson plan outline looks fine, but the activities are not geared toward students grade level or their interests.	Poor	Imcomplete The lesson plan outline is not fully completed. It needs to be improved.	Missing No Submission
Step 2. Search Options
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Missing 0 pts
Number of Options	Excellent All the objectives have at least two options listed. There are no overlaps. More than 2 options per task are listed. The number of options is balanced across the objectives. * Group is responsible for all members’ equal participation.	Good	Fair Some of the objectives only have one option listed or there is only one option per task listed.	Poor Not all the objectives have options listed. There are overlaps.	Incomplete Incomplete	Missing No Submission
Description of Technology	Excellent The features and the content of the tool are fully described. Anyone who reads the description would be able to imagine what the tool looks like and how to use it into the lesson unit.	Good	Fair Most of the features and the content of the tool are described. Anyone who reads the description may not be able to imagine what the tool looks like and how to use it into the lesson unit.	Poor The features and the content of the tool are not described in a clear manner. Anyone who reads the description would not be able to imagine what the tool looks like and how to use it into the lesson unit.	Incomplete Incomplete	Missing No Submission
Instructional Alignment	Excellent The technology options are aligned with learning objectives and the tasks identified from the STEP1. The description of how the option can address the lesson plan is described in a very clear and reasonable manner.	Good The technology options are aligned with learning objectives and the tasks identified from the STEP1. However, some of the description of how the option can address the lesson plan is not described in a very clear and reasonable manner.	Fair The technology options are not fully aligned with learning objectives and the tasks identified from the STEP1. Some of the description of how the option can address the lesson plan is not described in a very clear and reasonable manner.	Poor The technology options are not fully aligned with learning objectives and the tasks identified from the STEP1. Most of the description of how the option can address the lesson plan is not described in a very clear and reasonable manner.	Incomplete Incomplete	Missing No Submission
Students and Teacher's needs	Excellent All the options are age appropriate and geared toward the students and the teacher's needs in the case.	Good One or two of the options are not age appropriate and geared toward the students and the teacher's needs in the case.	Fair	Poor More than 50% of the options are not age appropriate and geared toward the students and the teacher's needs in the case.	Incomplete Incomplete	Missing No Submission
Step 3. Select Best Options and Why
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Missing 0 pts
Tool Selection	Excellent The technology tools selected are perfectly aligned with the lesson plan outline. The tools selected can be used for helping the teacher and students engage in the activities and make learning meaningful.	Good	Fair Most of the technology tools selected are aligned with the lesson plan outline. The tools selected can be used for helping the teacher and students engage in the activities and make learning meaningful.	Poor	Incomplete The tools selected are not aligned with the lesson plan outline well. It needs to be improved.	Missing No Submission
Justification	Excellent Justification was discussed based on the 3 e’s. Significant e’s were discussed with convincing rationales.	Good	Fair Justification was discussed based on the 3 e’s. Significant e’s were discussed with appropriate rationales.	Poor Justification was discussed based on the 3 e’s. E’s were discussed with rationales, but they do not provide in-depth understanding of the 3 E’s. (i.e., mostly re-using vocabulary used in the lecture)	Incomplete Justification was discussed based on the 3 e’s. E’s were discussed with inappropriate rationales.	Missing No Submission
Step 4. Procedures and Activities
	Excellent 15 pts	Good 12 pts	Fair 9 pts	Poor 5 pts	Incomplete 3 pts	Missing 0 pts
Sequence of Steps	Excellent The instructional sequence constitute a well developed plan. Plan is described well enough that a substitute teacher would be able to easily follow the instructions.	Good The instructional sequence is workable. A substitute teacher would be able to follow the instructions.	Fair The instructional sequence may work, but is not sufficiently clear. A substitute teacher may have some difficulty following the instructions.	Poor The instructional sequence probably will not work. A substitute teacher would have difficulty following the instructions.	Incomplete Incomplete	Missing No Submission
Step 4. Procedures and Activities
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 2 pts	Incomplete 1 pts	Missing 0 pts
Summarizing the Problem & Solution	Excellent Problems are restated clearly, with good argumentation on how each of them have been addressed in the technology choices or sequence.	Good Problems are restated clearly, with explanations on how each of them have been addressed in the technology choices or sequence.	Fair Problems are restated, with some explanations on how each of them have been addressed in the technology choices or sequence.	Poor Problems are not fully restated, and there is little or no explanation on how each of them have been addressed in the technology choices or sequence.	Incomplete Incomplete	Missing No Submission

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric