iRubric: Fall 2014 - W200 - Eportfolio rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Fall 2014 - W200 - Eportfolio Spring 2014 - W200 - Eportfolio Rubric Code: M599C Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: ePortfolio Grade Levels: Undergraduate

General Information-Home Descriptions Worth total 5 points
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good (Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable) 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent (All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional) 5 pts
Home Page	Missing No Submission.	Poor Home page is lacking 2-3 required elements. The page is not visually appealing and/or the content is not well-written, and inconsistent.	Fair	Good Home page contains most of the required elements The page does not make use of meaningful decorative elements. Content is relatively well-written and consistent.	Great	Excellent Home page contains all required elements • Welcomes visitors • Briefly explains the pages [About Me, Gallery, Case Projects, ISTE-T Standards, Professional Development] of the site • Internal links to the pages • Visually appealing - meaningful decorative elements Content is consistent and extremely well-written.
General Information-About Me Worth total 5 Points
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good (Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable) 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent (All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional) 5 pts
About Me page	Missing No Submission.	Poor About me page is missing 2-3 required elements. Inconsistencies in content, and the hyperlinks/ descriptions are obvious.	Fair	Good About me page contains most of the required elements. However, there is some inconsistency in the content, and hyperlinks/descriptions.	Great	Excellent About me page contains all required elements: • Your professional picture • Introduction of yourself (name, education, your subject area, and grade level) • Why do you want to be a teacher? • What are your pedagogical beliefs as a teacher? • Include your perspective on using technology in education. • Embedded digital story video (hyperlinked title, description and reflection) TIP#2: Embedded Go!Animate movie ( hyperlinked title and description)
General Information-Case Projects Worth a total 10 points
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Acceptable (Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable) 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent (All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional) 10 pts
Case projects	Missing No Submission.	Poor Some required items are missing, and the descriptions are lacking in detail. The page is disorganized.	Fair	Acceptable All required items are included, but the descriptions could be more comprehensive OR the page could be more well organized for viewers.	Good	Excellent All required items are included: • Embedded Case Analysis Google Doc with a description about the case (Reasonably sized, recommended: 600x300) • Two Case Artifacts (For each item: Hyperlinked title, embedded artifact or screen shot, description) Descriptions are comprehensive, and the page is well organized for viewers.
General Information-Gallery Worth total 15 points
	Missing No Submission. 0 pts	Poor 3 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good (Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable) 9 pts	Great 12 pts	Excellent (All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional) 15 pts
Gallery Page	Missing No Submission.	Poor The page showcases less than five best work examples. Inconsistencies in content, or hyperlinks/descriptions are obvious. The page is not visually attractive.	Fair	Good The page is a good showcase. However, there is some inconsistency in the content, or the hyperlinks/descriptions. The page is not made visually attractive with meaningful graphics.	Great	Excellent The page is an excellent showcase: • Five best work examples (public and published) • Each example has the following: - Title (linked) - Screen shot or embedded artifact - Description - Educational Value Effort made to make the page visually attractive.
General Information-ISTE-T Standard Worth a total of 40 points; 8 marks for each standard.
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good (Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable) 4 pts	Great 6 pts	Excellent (All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional) 8 pts
ISTE-T 1	Missing No Submission.	Poor • Provided only one example of evidence for Standard • Described the example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Fair	Good • Provided two examples of evidence for Standard • Described each example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Great	Excellent Three or more examples of evidence for the ISTE standard. Each example should have a hyperlinked title. Each example has three or more sentences connecting the example to the standard.
ISTE-T 2	Missing No Submission.	Poor • Provided only one example of evidence for Standard • Described the example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Fair	Good • Provided two examples of evidence for Standard • Described each example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Great	Excellent Three or more examples of evidence for the ISTE standard. Each example should have a hyperlinked title. Each example has three or more sentences connecting the example to the standard.
ISTE-T 3	Missing No Submission.	Poor • Provided only one example of evidence for Standard • Described the example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Fair	Good • Provided two examples of evidence for Standard • Described each example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Great	Excellent Three or more examples of evidence for the ISTE standard. Each example should have a hyperlinked title. Each example has three or more sentences connecting the example to the standard.
ISTE-T 4	Missing No Submission.	Poor • Provided only one example of evidence for Standard • Described the example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Fair	Good • Provided two examples of evidence for Standard • Described each example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Great	Excellent Three or more examples of evidence for the ISTE standard. Each example should have a hyperlinked title. Each example has three or more sentences connecting the example to the standard.
ISTE-T 5	Missing No Submission.	Poor • Provided only one example of evidence for Standard • Described the example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Fair	Good • Provided two examples of evidence for Standard • Described each example in at least two to three sentences connecting the example to the standard	Great	Excellent Three or more examples of evidence for the ISTE standard. Each example should have a hyperlinked title. Each example has three or more sentences connecting the example to the standard.
Professional Development Worth a total of 20 points, 5 points for each task
	BLANK 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good (Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable) 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
PD evaluation before/after course	BLANK No Submission.	Poor Both ISTE-T standards (1) pre- and (2) post- survey result images are missing from the page.	Fair	Good Either your ISTE-T standards (1) pre- OR (2) post- survey result images are missing from the page.	Great	Excellent Your ISTE-T standards (1) pre- and (2) post- survey result images are embedded on the page.
Analyzing survey data	BLANK No Submission.	Poor Less than three areas of strength, and three areas for improvement are indicated, and they are not based on survey data. There are no specific references to survey categories/items.	Fair	Good Three areas of strength, and three areas for improvement are indicated, but they do not seem to be based on survey data. There are no specific references to survey categories/items.	Great	Excellent Three areas of strength, and three areas for improvement are indicated, based on survey data. There are specific references to survey categories/items.
SMART PD Goals & Evidences	BLANK No Submission.	Poor Pre: The professional goals identified are not SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-bound). have been identified. Post: Personal statement on whether the goals have been met is missing. There is little or no evidence provided.	Fair	Good Pre: Three SMART professional development goals (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-bound) have been identified. Post: Personal statement on whether the goals have been met is presented. However, the evidences provided do not seem appropriate.	Great	Excellent Pre: Three SMART professional development goals (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-bound) have been identified. Post: Personal statement on whether the goals have been met is presented. Evidences are provided in the form of hyperlinks to artifacts produced in the course, with a short description.
TIP#11 & #12	BLANK No Submission.	Poor One or more items is missing from the page.	Fair	Good The required items are on the page, but the descriptions could be more detailed and meaningful.	Great	Excellent TIP #12: Title of LMS, screenshots of online course, description of how it can be used for teaching TIP #11: PLN. Screenshot, link, and description of what your PLN is and how you can use it.
E-book project page Total of 10 marks.
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Good (Required elements are partially present and the quality is acceptable) 6 pts	Great 8 pts	Excellent (All required elements are completely present and the quality is exceptional) 10 pts
E-book project	Missing	Poor At least one of the required items is missing from the page.	Fair	Good The required items are on the page. However, the description does not provide enough detail on the learning goals and the usefulness of the book.	Great	Excellent Required items: - Embedded eBook project, or a link to the eBook file. - Title and description of eBook. Description should discuss the eBooks' learning goals and how your book helps students meet them.
Professionalism & Overall Quality Worth total 15 points
	Missing 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Consistency of Formatting and Font	Missing No Submission.	Poor Errors in formatting are obvious in multiple pages of the site.	Fair	Good Site is generally well formatted. There are more than five instances of inconsistent formatting in the pages and/or the copyright information is not added below the navigational box.	Great	Excellent Site is exceptionally well formatted. Consistency in terms of the font used, font size, and color (easily readable). This includes: Titles, Subheadings, Body text and links. Additionally: -Spacing between blocks of text are not too big/small - Headings and subheadings are used to guide readers - Bullets/Numbers list & indentations are appropriately used - Copyright information for the site is added below the navigational box.
Writing Mechanics	Missing No Submission.	Poor Errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization are obvious on multiple pages of the site.	Fair	Good • Some spelling, grammar, punctuation, capitalization errors have been spotted. • Writing is sometimes informal/not professional.	Great	Excellent The whole site contains no spelling, punctuation, capitalization, grammar or other formal writing errors. Strong evidence of formal/professional writing (avoids contractions, abbreviations, “I feel/think”)
Overall Quality	Missing No Submission.	Poor The ePortfolio does not give an impression of professionalism, and is not indicative of one's potential as a teacher.	Fair	Good The ePortfolio gives an impression of professionalism, and evidence of one's potential as a teacher.	Great	Excellent The ePortfolio gives an excellent impression of professionalism, and strong evidence of one's potential as a teacher.

Keywords:

W200 Fall 2014

Subjects:

Education

Types:

ePortfolio

Discuss this rubric